Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Castleberry, 758 So. 2d 749.

197 citing documents.

  • State v. Scott 913 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Frank, supra, citing State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), .
  • State v. Bonner 895 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    "For an accomplice's testimony to be materially corroborated, `it is enough if there is evidence that confirms material points in an accomplice's tale, and confirms the defendant's identity and some relation to the situation.'" State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , *13 citing United States v. Lee, 506 F.2d 111 (D.C.Cir.1974).
  • State v. Jones 891 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 22 (La.4/13/99), .
  • State v. Johnson 892 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Divers 889 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Castleberry, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Boatner 861 So. 2d 149 La. 2003
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • Cheairs v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 861 So. 2d 536 La. 2003
    Id.; State v. Castleberry, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/13/99), .
  • State v. Jones 862 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    art. 770 are applicable, should only be used when substantial prejudice to the defendant is shown.” State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 22 (La.4/13/99), .
  • State v. Wallace 862 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    art. 801(C); State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 18 (La.4/13/99), ; State v. Raby, 98-1453, p. 8-9 (La.App.
  • State v. Toups 859 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    The Louisiana Supreme Court has repeatedly held that prosecutors may not turn closing arguments “into a plebiscite on crime.” State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 42 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. John R. Chesson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Chesson 856 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. MacCracken 845 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert denied, 528 U.S. 893 , 120 S.Ct.
  • State v. Lee 844 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 23 (La.4/13/99), -769 (an error is harmless if the verdict rendered was surely unattributable to the error).
  • State v. Price 842 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    "An error is harmless if `the verdict rendered was surely unattributable to the error.'" State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 23 (La.4/13/99), -769 , quoting State v. Koon, 96-1208 (La.5/20/97), ; accord State v. Whitton, 99-1953, p. 17 (La.App.
  • State v. Hall 843 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 23 (La.4/13/99), .
  • Robinson v. Healthworks Intern., LLC 837 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), .
  • State v. Young 839 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    Frank, supra (citing State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), ).
  • State v. Parent 836 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Hamilton 834 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), .
  • State v. Doleman 835 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 28 (La.4/13/99), ; State v. Chester, 97-2790, p. 8 (La.12/1/98), .
  • State v. Simpson 829 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Frank, supra (citing State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), )).
  • State v. Boatner 844 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Id.; State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), , certiorari denied sub nom.
  • State v. Harry 823 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Frank, supra (citing State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), ).
  • State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
    State v. Castleberry , 98-1388 at p. 29 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Bowie 813 So. 2d 377 La. 2002
    ly painful manner, and he died while being tormented and tortured.") (victim was bound with electric cord, some of which was wrapped around his neck; stabbed five times in the throat, hit in the face, skull and forehead with something like a claw hammer; salt had been poured over his eyes, face and down his throat, and he was strangled to death); State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 31 (La.4/13/99), (defendant forced the victim to look at him before beating him about the head with an iron skillet w
  • State v. Cowart 815 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Plaisance 811 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    See Hoffman, 768 So.2d at 587 (finding that where defendant could point to no specific prejudice, the failure to record bench conferences did not constitute reversible error); Castleberry, [98-1388 (La.4/13/99), ] 758 So.2d at 772-73 (stating that absence from the record of four unrecorded bench conferences did not deny defendant effective appellate review); State v. Brumfield, 96-2667, pp. 14-16 (La.10/28/98), -670 (holding that the trial court's failure to have each bench conference and ruling
  • State v. Johnson 817 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Citing State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99); , cert.
  • State v. Brown 804 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), .
  • State v. Dorsey 796 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.04/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. MM 802 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    [61] 98-1388 (La.4/13/99); , cert.
  • State v. M.M. 802 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    98-1388 (La.4/13/99); , cert.
  • State v. Ste. Marie 801 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    In State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 51 (La.4/13/99); , cert.
  • State v. Frank 803 So. 2d 1 La. 2001
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), (citing State v. Hawkins, 96-0766 (La.1/14/97), ).
  • State v. Deruise 802 So. 2d 1224 La. 2001
    See State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), ; State v. Hawkins, 96-0766, p. 8 (La.1/14/97), ; State v. Allen, 95-1754, p. 11 (La.9/5/96), .
  • State v. Allen 788 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Rodriguez 781 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 23 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Harris 781 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Castleberry, 98 1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), .
  • State v. Simmons 779 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    Although the right to review of a complete record has been found to apply in habitual offender proceedings, as in State v. Palrean, 395 So.2d at 690 , a defendant is not entitled *863 to relief absent a showing of prejudice based on the missing portions of the record, State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Keys 772 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    art. 801(C); State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 18 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Jones 765 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    See State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.04/13/99), .
  • State v. Jones 769 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    art. 801(C); State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 18 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Milton 764 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Carter 762 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    art. 801(C); State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 18 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
    See State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, pp. 28-29 (La.4/13/99), (absence from the record of four unrecorded bench conferences did not deny defendant effective appellate review; three of the conferences had no discernible impact on the proceedings and the fourth concerned a mistrial motion whose basis was readily discernible in the recorded testimony of the witness); State v. Brumf