Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Castleberry, 758 So. 2d 749.

197 citing documents.

  • State v. Wilson 69 So. 3d 598 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamarcus Dewayne Dorsey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 11 (La.4/13/99), -60, cert.
  • State v. Dorsey 58 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 11 (La.4/13/99), -60 , cert, denied, 528 U.S. 893 , 120 S.Ct.
  • State v. Brown 56 So. 3d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Simmons , 99-1154 at p. 10, 779 So.2d at 862-863 , citing State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), , | 2q773.
  • State v. Massey 51 So. 3d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Third, and “[fjinally, a defendant is not entitled to relief because of an incomplete record absent a showing of prejudice based on the missing portions of the transcripts.” Frank, supra, citing State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), .
  • State v. Declouet 52 So. 3d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Stewart , 08-1265 at 14, 15 So.3d at 285 ; see also Chesson, 03-606 at 29, 856 So.2d at 186 (citing State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Burton 43 So. 3d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    art. 770 are applicable, should only be used when substantial prejudice to the defendant is shown.” State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 22 (La.4/13/99), .
  • State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 31 (La.4/13/99), (finding heinous nature of crime supported “given that defendant forced the victim to look at him before beating him about the head with an iron skillet with such force that the skillet broke and then, finding the victim still alive, smothered him to death, all while the victim was bound and gagged”), cert.
  • State v. Goldman 41 So. 3d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Id.; State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • Tasha Tingle, Etc. v. American Home Assurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Tingle v. American Home Assurance Co. 40 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Dee 34 So. 3d 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Negron 25 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    4/13/99), -56 , cert, denied, 528 U.S. 893 , 120 S. Ct. 220 , 145 L. Ed. 2d 185 (1999).
  • State of Louisiana v. Bryan Means La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Means 25 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Ashley 22 So. 3d 1045 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Castleberry, 1998-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Johnson 22 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), .
  • State, in the Interest of Jw 17 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Stukes 19 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Third, and “[flinally, a defendant is not entitled to relief because of an incomplete record absent a showing of prejudice based on the missing portions of the transcripts.” Frank, supra, citing State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), .
  • Succession of Robert Edwards, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Id.; State v. Castleberry, 1998-1388 (La.4/13/99)
  • In Re Succession of Edwards 11 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Id.; State v. Castleberry, 1998-1388 (La.4/13/99), .
  • State v. Stewart 15 So. 3d 276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    See State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 14 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Turner 13 So. 3d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Shirley 10 So. 3d 224 La. 2009
    State v. Castleberry, 99-1388 (La.4/13/99), ; 6 see also United States v. *229 Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 172-75 , 94 S.Ct.
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrell Stipe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), cert.
  • State v. Stipe 4 So. 3d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Allen 5 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    art. 770 are applicable, should only be used when substantial prejudice to the defendant is shown.” State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 22-(La.4/13/99), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Norris A. Palms La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. D. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. D.T. 998 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 11 (La.4/13/99), -60 , cert denied, 528 U.S. 893 , 120 S.Ct.
  • State v. DT 998 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 11 (La.4/13/99), -60 , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Clyde Milton Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Id.; State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 13 (La.4/13/99)
  • State v. Jones 999 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Id.; State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 13 (La.4/13/99), .
  • State v. Clement 1 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 31 (La.4/13/99), (finding heinous nature of crime supported the death penalty given that defendant forced the victim to look at him before beating him about the head with an iron skillet with such force that the skillet broke and then, finding the victim still alive, smothered him to death, all while the victim was bound and gagg
  • State v. Campbell 983 So. 2d 810 La. 2008
    Draughn , XXXX-XXXX p. 63, 950 So.2d at 625 ; State v. Castleberry, XXXX-XXXX p. 29 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • Everhardt v. LOUISIANA DOTD 978 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    See also State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 37 (La.4/13/99), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Walter R. Cox, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Cox 974 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    1266 , 154 L.Ed.2d 1089 (2003); State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Vincent 978 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    [2] State v. Castleberry, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Pinion 968 So. 2d 131 La. 2007
    See, e.g., Hoffman, 98-3118 at 50-51, 768 So.2d at 587 (trial court cured any record problems "by summarizing substantive unrecorded conferences for the record"); State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, pp. 28-29 (La.4/13/99), (three unrecorded bench conferences during direct examination of state witnesses had no discernible impact on the proceedings and the fourth concerned a mistrial motion by defense counsel, the basis of which was "easily ascertainable from the record" without regard to the unrecorde
  • State v. Arnold 970 So. 2d 1067 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 13 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles Hatch La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Id.; State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 13 (La.4/13/99)
  • State v. Hatch 964 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Id.; State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 13 (La.4/13/99), .
  • State v. Lang 960 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , U.S. cert.
  • State v. Draughn 950 So. 2d 583 La. 2007
    State v. Castleberry, XXXX-XXXX p. 29 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Hughes 943 So. 2d 1047 La. 2006
    Id.; State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 13 (La.4/13/99), .
  • Lam Ex Rel Lam v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins 946 So. 2d 133 La. 2006
    State v. Castleberry, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/13/99), .
  • State v. Smart 926 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    NOTES [1] State v. Castleberry, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/13/99), , cert.
  • State v. Brooks 914 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
    In State v. Castleberry, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/13/99), , cert.