Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Castleberry, 758 So. 2d 749.
-
State v. Wilson
69 So. 3d 598
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), .
-
State of Louisiana v. Jamarcus Dewayne Dorsey
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 11 (La.4/13/99), -60, cert.
-
State v. Dorsey
58 So. 3d 637
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 11 (La.4/13/99), -60 , cert, denied, 528 U.S. 893 , 120 S.Ct.
-
State v. Brown
56 So. 3d 1095
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Simmons , 99-1154 at p. 10, 779 So.2d at 862-863 , citing State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), , | 2q773.
-
State v. Massey
51 So. 3d 808
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Third, and “[fjinally, a defendant is not entitled to relief because of an incomplete record absent a showing of prejudice based on the missing portions of the transcripts.” Frank, supra, citing State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), .
-
State v. Declouet
52 So. 3d 89
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Stewart , 08-1265 at 14, 15 So.3d at 285 ; see also Chesson, 03-606 at 29, 856 So.2d at 186 (citing State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
-
State v. Burton
43 So. 3d 1073
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
art. 770 are applicable, should only be used when substantial prejudice to the defendant is shown.” State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 22 (La.4/13/99), .
-
State v. Dressner
45 So. 3d 127
La. 2010
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 31 (La.4/13/99), (finding heinous nature of crime supported “given that defendant forced the victim to look at him before beating him about the head with an iron skillet with such force that the skillet broke and then, finding the victim still alive, smothered him to death, all while the victim was bound and gagged”), cert.
-
State v. Goldman
41 So. 3d 642
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Id.; State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
- Tasha Tingle, Etc. v. American Home Assurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
-
Tingle v. American Home Assurance Co.
40 So. 3d 1169
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Hoffman, 98-3118, State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
-
State v. Dee
34 So. 3d 892
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
-
State v. Negron
25 So. 3d 249
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4/13/99), -56 , cert, denied, 528 U.S. 893 , 120 S. Ct. 220 , 145 L. Ed. 2d 185 (1999).
- State of Louisiana v. Bryan Means La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- State v. Means 25 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
-
State v. Ashley
22 So. 3d 1045
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Castleberry, 1998-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
-
State v. Johnson
22 So. 3d 205
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), .
- State, in the Interest of Jw 17 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
State v. Stukes
19 So. 3d 1233
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Third, and “[flinally, a defendant is not entitled to relief because of an incomplete record absent a showing of prejudice based on the missing portions of the transcripts.” Frank, supra, citing State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), .
-
Succession of Robert Edwards, Sr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Id.; State v. Castleberry, 1998-1388 (La.4/13/99)
-
In Re Succession of Edwards
11 So. 3d 1234
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Id.; State v. Castleberry, 1998-1388 (La.4/13/99), .
-
State v. Stewart
15 So. 3d 276
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 14 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
-
State v. Turner
13 So. 3d 695
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
-
State v. Shirley
10 So. 3d 224
La. 2009
State v. Castleberry, 99-1388 (La.4/13/99), ; 6 see also United States v. *229 Matlock, 415 U.S. 164, 172-75 , 94 S.Ct.
-
State of Louisiana v. Terrell Stipe
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), cert.
-
State v. Stipe
4 So. 3d 189
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 29 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
-
State v. Allen
5 So. 3d 274
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
art. 770 are applicable, should only be used when substantial prejudice to the defendant is shown.” State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 22-(La.4/13/99), .
- State of Louisiana v. Norris A. Palms La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
- State of Louisiana v. D. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
-
State v. D.T.
998 So. 2d 1258
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 11 (La.4/13/99), -60 , cert denied, 528 U.S. 893 , 120 S.Ct.
-
State v. DT
998 So. 2d 1258
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 11 (La.4/13/99), -60 , cert.
-
State of Louisiana v. Clyde Milton Jones
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Id.; State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 13 (La.4/13/99)
-
State v. Jones
999 So. 2d 239
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Id.; State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 13 (La.4/13/99), .
-
State v. Clement
1 So. 3d 547
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 5 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
-
State v. Anderson
996 So. 2d 973
La. 2008
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 31 (La.4/13/99), (finding heinous nature of crime supported the death penalty given that defendant forced the victim to look at him before beating him about the head with an iron skillet with such force that the skillet broke and then, finding the victim still alive, smothered him to death, all while the victim was bound and gagg
-
State v. Campbell
983 So. 2d 810
La. 2008
Draughn , XXXX-XXXX p. 63, 950 So.2d at 625 ; State v. Castleberry, XXXX-XXXX p. 29 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
-
Everhardt v. LOUISIANA DOTD
978 So. 2d 1036
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
See also State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 37 (La.4/13/99), .
- State of Louisiana v. Walter R. Cox, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
-
State v. Cox
974 So. 2d 891
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
1266 , 154 L.Ed.2d 1089 (2003); State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
-
State v. Vincent
978 So. 2d 967
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
[2] State v. Castleberry, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/13/99), , cert.
-
State v. Pinion
968 So. 2d 131
La. 2007
See, e.g., Hoffman, 98-3118 at 50-51, 768 So.2d at 587 (trial court cured any record problems "by summarizing substantive unrecorded conferences for the record"); State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, pp. 28-29 (La.4/13/99), (three unrecorded bench conferences during direct examination of state witnesses had no discernible impact on the proceedings and the fourth concerned a mistrial motion by defense counsel, the basis of which was "easily ascertainable from the record" without regard to the unrecorde
-
State v. Arnold
970 So. 2d 1067
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 13 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
-
State of Louisiana v. Charles Hatch
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Id.; State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 13 (La.4/13/99)
-
State v. Hatch
964 So. 2d 394
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Id.; State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 13 (La.4/13/99), .
-
State v. Lang
960 So. 2d 318
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Castleberry, 98-1388 (La.4/13/99), , U.S. cert.
-
State v. Draughn
950 So. 2d 583
La. 2007
State v. Castleberry, XXXX-XXXX p. 29 (La.4/13/99), , cert.
-
State v. Hughes
943 So. 2d 1047
La. 2006
Id.; State v. Castleberry, 98-1388, p. 13 (La.4/13/99), .
-
Lam Ex Rel Lam v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins
946 So. 2d 133
La. 2006
State v. Castleberry, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/13/99), .
-
State v. Smart
926 So. 2d 637
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
NOTES [1] State v. Castleberry, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/13/99), , cert.
-
State v. Brooks
914 So. 2d 110
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
In State v. Castleberry, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/13/99), , cert.