Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Boullt v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 752 So. 2d 739.

29 citing documents.

Jared M. Clesi Versus Donice J. Rayford, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Xyz Hospice Company, Uvw Insurance … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
Damon Baldone v. Progressive Insurance Company and Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Brett Lirette v. Jason C. Adams, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Geico Casualty Company & Axis Ventures, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Brett Lirette v. Jason C. Adams, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Geico Casualty Company & Axis Ventures, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Faith A. Boudoin Versus Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon, Amex Assurance Company, Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company, … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Marguerite C. Slattery v. Ashley N. Holdsworth La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
10/19/99), citing Lee R. Russ & Thomas F. Segalla, Couch on Insurance, 3d § 169.4, at 169-15 to -14, 169.7, at 169-20 to -21 (3d ed. 1998).2 Interpolicy stacking occurs when the insured attempts to recover UM benefits under more than one UM coverage provision or policy, while 2 In Boullt, the Louisi
Green v. Michael Johnson, State Farm Ins. Agency, Allstate Ins. Co. 241 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Forvendel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 230 So. 3d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Harper v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Hospitals 176 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., 99-0942 (La.10/19/99), -44 .
Michael Broussard v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Broussard v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 91 So. 3d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Co., 99-942 (La.10/19/99), ).
Norma Jean Hardy and Jonathan David Hardy v. Gene M. Augustine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
10/19/99), and the fourth circuit’s holding in Campbell v. State Farm Ins.
Hardy v. Augustine 54 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., 99-0942 (La.10/19/99), , and the fourth circuit’s holding in Campbell v. State Farm Ins.
Marcotte v. Progressive SEC. Ins. Co. 955 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Co., 99-0942, p. 7 (La.10/19/99), .
Halverson v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co. 929 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Co., 99-0942, p. 7 (La.10/19/99), , 743 4 .
Louviere v. State 923 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Co., 99-0942, p. 8 (La.10/19/99), -744 .
Marjorie Cooks v. Rental Service Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
10/19/99), the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that in order for the issue of stacking to arise at all, “the individual seeking to stack coverages must in fact be an insured as to the particular loss under more than one policy or a single policy covering multiple vehicles.” Thus, a stacking claim involves the relatio
Cooks v. Rental Service Corp. 900 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
In Boullt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 99-942, p. 7 (La.10/19/99), , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that in order for the issue of stacking to arise at all, “the individual seeking to stack coverages must in fact be an insured as to the particular loss under more than one policy or a single policy covering multiple vehicles.” Thus, a stacking claim involves the rela *1149
Christopher Sims v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
10/19/99), -44 (citations omitted).
Sims v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 897 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Co., 99-942, p. 8 (La.10/19/99), -44 (citations omitted).
Michelle A. Egle v. Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
10/19/99), the supreme court again quoted with approval the above language from its decision in Nall.
Egle v. Allstate Insurance Co. 889 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Recently, in Boullt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 99-0942 (La.10/19/99), , the supreme court again quoted with approval the above language from its decision in Nall .
Walker v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. 850 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Boullt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/19/99), .
Pitts v. Fitzgerald 818 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Shortly thereafter, the Louisiana Supreme *850 Court decided Boullt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 99-0942 (La.10/19/99), , holding that divorced parents could each recover under their own individual UM policies for damages sustained as a result of the wrongful death of their minor daughter, without violating the anti-stacking statute.
Seither v. Winnebago Industries, Inc. 808 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Co., 99-0942 (La.10/19/99), , the court defined the concept of stacking: Stacking of UM coverages occurs when the amount available under one policy is inadequate to satisfy the damages alleged or awarded the insured and the same insured seeks to combine or stack one coverage on top of another for the same loss covered *795 under multiple policie
Distinguished Campbell v. State Farm Ins. Co. 804 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State Farm further argues that the two cases relied upon by Mr. and Mrs. Campbell, Boullt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 99-0942 (La.10/19/99), and Crabtree v. State Farm Ins.
Bel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 767 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Boullt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 99-0942, p. 8 (La.10/19/99), -744 ; Walls , 98-0455 at p. 14, 740 So.2d at 1273 .
Livas v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 797 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Co., 99-0942 (La.10/19/99), .
Gray v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co. 764 So. 2d 1050 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Co., 99-0942, p. 3 (La.10/19/99), ; Nall v. State Farm Mut.