DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Guillot v. Munn, 756 So. 2d 290.

41 citing documents.

  • Bart Timothy Bordelon v. Jamie Lynn Difrancesco Bordelon La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
  • Michelle Deshotel Brignac Versus Keith Anthony Brignac La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
    3/24/00), Stogner v. Stogner, 98-3044 (La.
  • Kailey Gerage v. William McCants La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
  • Lindley Scott Holleman v. Natalie Louise Barrilleaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    3/24/00), writ denied, 05-183 (La.
  • Lindley Scott Holleman v. Natalie Louise Barrilleaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    3/24/00), writ denied, 05-183 (La.
  • Karl Jude Hensgens v. Alanna Wingate Hensgens La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    3/24/00), that since the child support guidelines are presumptively correct, “the party advocating a deviation bears the burden of proving the guideline amount is not in the best interest of the child or would be inequitable to the parties.” The trial court cited Guillot for the proposition that deviations are warrante
  • State of Louisiana v. Avery Dickens, II. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
  • Roy Steven Calhoun v. Jennifer Anne Levinson Calhoun La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
    Guillot v. Munn, 99–2132 (La.3/24/00), Jones v. Jones, 38,790 (La.
  • Brock Taylor Gary v. Ali Renee Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132 (La.3/24/00)
  • Gary v. LeBlanc 222 So. 3d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Atkinson v. Atkinson 212 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Brossett v. Brossett 195 So. 3d 471 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    Guillot v. Munn, 1999-2132 (La.03/24/00), .
  • Carter v. Carter 155 So. 3d 81 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132 (La.3/24/00), .
  • State Department of Children & Family Services ex rel. J.C. v. Charles 131 So. 3d 1054 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See, Vaccari v. Vaccari, 10-2016 (La.12/10/10), (citing Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132 (La.3/24/00), -96 ).
  • Estapa v. Lorenz 91 So. 3d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    9:315.1(A); Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132 (La.3/24/00), .
  • Vaccari v. Vaccari 50 So. 3d 139 La. 2010
    with each parent contributing in proportion to his or her resources.” Guilliot v. Munn, 99-2132 (La.3/24/00), -96 .
  • Shawnna Marie Carrier Loftin v. Glen Edward Loftin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Loftin v. Loftin 28 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132, p. 1 (La.3/24/00), .
  • Semmes v. Semmes 27 So. 3d 1024 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132 (La.3/24/00), ; Jones v. Jones, 38,790 (La.App.2d Cir.6/25/04), .
  • State, Dept. of Social Services v. Hughes 989 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    “When deviating from the guidelines, courts must give specific reasons for the deviation, specifying the particular facts and circumstances evidencing that a deviation is warranted.” Guillot v. Munn, 1999-2132, p. 8 (La.3/24/00), .
  • Aydelott v. Aydelott 957 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    9:315.1(A); Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132 (La.3/24/00), .
  • Martello v. Martello 960 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132 (La.3/24/00), .
  • State, Department of Social Services v. Burkett 941 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    9:315.8(E)(3); Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132 (La.3/24/00), .
  • Rebecca Lalonde Desoto v. Troy William Desoto La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3/24/00), discussed the policy underpinnings of Louisiana’s custody and support laws in determining whether deviation from the guidelines was appropriate.
  • Patrick Murphy v. Susan Lynn Murphy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • DeSoto v. DeSoto 893 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    The supreme court in Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132 (La.3/24/00), discussed the policy underpinnings of Louisiana's custody and support laws in determining whether deviation from the guidelines was appropriate.
  • Murphy v. Murphy 894 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Susan argues in her appellate brief that the reduction amounted to a deviation from the child support guidelines, which she states is subject to the test outlined by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132 (La.3/24/00), .
  • Borne v. Sutton 892 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In his brief, Sutton quotes extensively from Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132 (La.3/24/00), .
  • Wendy P. Lea v. David B. Sanders La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • Lea v. Sanders 890 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132, p. 8 (La.3/24/00) .
  • Jones v. Jones 877 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132 (La.03/24/00), .
  • D'Aquilla v. D'Aquilla 879 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    The Louisiana Supreme Court case of Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132 (La.3/24/00), , enunciated a three-prong test to determine whether a deviation from the support guidelines is justified based on the length of time the child spends with the nondomiciliary parent.
  • Liles v. Liles 850 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    9:315.1(B); Guillot v. Munn, 1999-2132 (La.03/24/00), .
  • Walden v. Walden 835 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132 (La.3/24/00), , provided guidance on the application of La.
  • Edwards v. Dominick 815 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    1 Cir. 6/25/99) , , writ granted, 99-2132 (La.11/5/99), , and reversed in part on other grounds, 99-2132 (La.3/24/00), .
  • Dugger v. Dugger 785 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132 (La.3/24/00); .
  • Templeton v. Templeton 774 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    In Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132, pp. 13-14 (La.3/24/00), -01 , the Louisiana Supreme Court enunciated a three-prong test to determine whether a deviation was justified based on the length of time the child spends with the nondomiciliary parent.
  • STATE IN INTEREST OF GILBERT v. Gilbert 775 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    9:315.1; Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132 (La.3/24/00), .
  • Glorioso v. Glorioso 776 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132 (La.3/24/00), , stated: Louisiana's guidelines utilize the income shares model to fix the appropriate level of child support.
  • Berry v. Berry 772 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    We further note that the supreme court recently addressed the obligation of one seeking a deviation from the Guidelines based on the amount of time spent with a child in Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132, p. 1 (La.3/24/00); , 292 and concluded: [A]n automatic deviation is not allowed.
  • Curtis v. Curtis 773 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    [3] Guillot v. Munn, 99-2132 (La.03/24/00), .