Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Timmons v. Silman, 761 So. 2d 507.

33 citing documents.

Lionel Jones and Willie Wilson v. Maryland Casualty Company, Zurich American Insurance Company, Powell's Cable Company and Karen … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
CD Individually and as Tutor of His Minor Child SD v. SC, Individually and as the Parent and … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
5/16/00), Payne, supra; Candler v. Henderson, 48,441 (La.
Andrew F. Payne v. Gregory Glen Stanley, Mitchell B. Stanley, and Michael Brian Stanley La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
5/16/00), Candler, supra.
Wade Conner v. Klarc Lemelle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Bowdoin v. WHC Maintenance Services, Inc. 230 So. 3d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/16/00), (citations omitted).
Dustin William Bowdoin v. Whc Maintenance Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5/16/00), (citations omitted).
Hull v. Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 1 220 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Ledet ex rel. Ledet v. Robinson Helicopter Co. 195 So. 3d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264 (La.5/16/00), .
Sharp v. United Fire & Indemnity Co. 185 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In support, Mr. Sharp cites Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264 (La.5/16/00), , and Portillo v. Progressive Paloverde Ins.
Bova v. Butler 168 So. 3d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264, p. 4 (La.5/16/00), ; La.
Julia B. Voinche v. Joseph Beaud Capps La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Voinche v. Capps 155 So. 3d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264 (La.5/16/00), .
Candler v. Henderson 128 So. 3d 587 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264 (La.5/16/00), .
Holt v. Torino 117 So. 3d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264 (La.5/16/00), .
Zeitoun v. City of New Orleans 81 So. 3d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264, p. 4 (La.5/16/00), .
Macaluso v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. 59 So. 3d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264, p. 4 (La.5/16/00), .
MacAluso v. TRAVELERS CAS. AND SUR. CO. 59 So. 3d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264, p. 4 (La.5/16/00), .
Sandra Williams v. Ace Transportation, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
In Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264 (La.5/16/00), the court ruled that an employee, Ms. Silman, who had gone to the post office to refill a postage meter for her employer was not within the course and scope of her employment when she was involved in an automobile accident.
Williams v. Ace Transportation, Inc. 33 So. 3d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264 (La.5/16/00), , the court ruled that an employee, Ms. Silman, who had gone to the post office to refill a postage meter for her employer was not within the course and scope of her employment when she was involved in an automobile accident.
Aucoin v. Rochel 5 So. 3d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264, p. 4 (La.5/16/00), .
Henly v. Phillips Abita Lumber Co. 971 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264 (La.5/16/00), .
James R. Duplechain v. Bell Office Supply La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Duplechain v. Bell Office Supply 926 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264, p. 5 (La.5/16/00), .
Proactive Therapy v. Yellow Book, USA Consolidated With Jo Lynn Duran v. Yellow Book, USA La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
5/16/00), the court ruled that an employee, Ms. Silman, who had gone to the post office to refill a postage meter for her employer was not within the course and scope of her employment when she was involved in an automobile accident.
Proactive Therapy v. Yellow Book, USA 880 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
In Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264 (La.5/16/00), , the court ruled that an employee, Ms. Silman, who had gone to the post office to refill a postage meter for her employer was not within the course and scope of her employment when she was involved in an automobile accident.
Dean v. Southmark Const. 879 So. 2d 112 La. 2004
See also Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264 (La.5/16/00), -16 .
Smith v. Morange 858 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
“Under Louisiana law, an employer is answerable for the damage occasioned by its servants in the exercise of the functions in which the servant is employed.” Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264 (La.5/16/00), .
Strain v. Williams 835 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
art. 2320; Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264, p. 4 (La.5/16/00), ; Orgeron v. McDonald, 93-1353, p. 4 (La.7/5/94), .
Young v. Mooney 815 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
The supreme court in Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264, p. 4 (La.5/16/00); -511 , recently addressed the employment deviation issue.
Faust v. Greater Lakeside Corp. 797 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Civ.Code art 2320; Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264, p. 3 (La.5/16/00), ; Lamonte v. Premier Sales, Inc., 00-299, p. 9 (La.App.
Faust v. Greater Lakeside Corp. 797 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Civ.Code art 2320; Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264, p. 3 (La.5/16/00), ; Lamonte v. Premier Sales, Inc., 00-299, p. 9 (La.App.
Distinguished Davis v. AMS Tube Corp. 801 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
The facts of this case are distinguishable from Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264, pp. 4-6 (La.5/16/2000), -511 .
Sallean v. Jefferson Parish Medical Society 788 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
| .-Plaintiff disagrees, citing Timmons v. Silman, 99-3264 (La.5/16/00), .