DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Branch, 759 So. 2d 31.

13 citing documents.

  • State Of Louisiana v. J Amaal Edwards La. 2022
    6 (per curiam) (“A Louisiana jury considering an accused’s dual plea of not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity must nevertheless first determine whether the state has proved the essential elements of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt before it may proceed to a determination of whether he was
  • State of Louisiana Versus Jamaal Edwards La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
    3/17/00), (per curiam) (“A Louisiana jury considering an accused's dual plea of not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity must nevertheless first determine whether the state has proved the essential elements of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt before it may proceed to a de
  • State of Louisiana v. Brennen D. Lark La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
  • State v. Richardson 241 So. 3d 1201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    3/17/00), , 32 ( per curiam ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Glenn Cook 226 So. 3d 387 La. 2017
    3/17/00), (per curiam) (“A Louisiana jury considering an accused’s dual plea of not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity must nevertheless first determine whether the state has proved the essential elements of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt before it may proceed to a determination of whether he was
  • State v. Overstreet 111 So. 3d 308 La. 2013
    the defendant committed an act that constitutes a criminal offense”); State v. Branch, 99-1484 (La.3/17/00), ("a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity rests on a determination by the factfinder that the defendant committed the acts charged against him .
  • State v. Abbott 97 So. 3d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Branch, 99-1484 (La.3/17/00), (per curiam).
  • State v. Williams 76 So. 3d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Branch, 99-1484 (La.3/17/00), (per curiam).
  • State v. Morgan 863 So. 2d 520 La. 2004
    State v. Branch, 99-1484, p. 2 (La.3/17/00), ("A defendant asserting that he or she was insane at the time of the offense may ...
  • State v. Clark 851 So. 2d 1055 La. 2003
    State v. Branch, 99-1484, p. 2 (La.3/17/00), (citing La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Sopczak 823 So. 2d 978 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [4] State v. Branch, 99-1484, p. 1 (La.3/17/00), (per curiam).
  • State v. Williams 804 So. 2d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    See State v. Branch, 99-1484, p. 1 (La.3/17/00), (per curiam).
  • State v. Roman 802 So. 2d 1281 La. 2001
    urge at trial all other defense available under the law," State v. Branch, 99-1484, p. 2 (La.3/17/00), , counsel must also consider that "[t]he making of inconsistent defenses is likely to confuse the jury and to bring public opprobrium on the criminal justice system for tolerating such monkeyshines."