Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Guzman, 769 So. 2d 1158.

575 citing documents.

  • State v. Phayarath 866 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In State v. Guzman, 99-1528, p. 6 (La.5/16/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held, “whether a trial court complied with La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Volgamore 865 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Cooper 864 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Lingefelt 865 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Jarrett 862 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State of Louisiana v. David Wayne Wilturner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Wilturner 858 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Kennedy 859 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Jackson 855 So. 2d 989 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. King 856 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Albert C. Girtley, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    5/16/00), quoting United States v. Johnson, 1 F.3d 296, 302 (5th Cir. 1993) (en banc) (expressly overruling United States v. Martirosian, 967 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir. 1992) (citing United States v. Bachynsky, 934 F.2d at 1360).
  • State v. Crutchfield 855 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Washington, 29,478 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), .
  • State v. Brown 852 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Eason 850 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Washington, 29,478 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), .
  • State v. Shaw 850 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Washington, 29,478 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97)
  • State v. Edison 847 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Bradford, 29,519 (La.App.
  • State v. Ford 846 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    See also State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Echols, 99-2226 (La.App.
  • State v. Howard 842 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Washington, 29,-478 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), .
  • State v. Mandosia 842 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Washington, 29,478 (La.
  • State v. Anderson 842 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Vu 846 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, p. 9 (La.5/16/00), n. 1 .
  • State v. Green 839 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.05/16/00), .
  • State v. Wright 839 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.05/16/00), .
  • State v. Johnson 839 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Snow 839 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Verdin 845 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), (per curiam); *376 (La.App.
  • State v. Gleason 836 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Norris 837 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.05/16/00), .
  • State v. Smith 839 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Fairley, 02-168 (La.App.
  • State v. Quiambao 833 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Gay 830 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.05/16/00)
  • State v. Moseley 830 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    In State v. Stiles, 99-1528 (La.05/16/00), , the supreme court upheld consecutive maximum sentences imposed for multiple counts of aggravated incest with a minor.
  • State v. Gay 830 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.05/16/00)
  • State v. Yates 828 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Sullivan 827 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    [2] However, the supreme court in State v. Guzman, 99-1753, 99-1528 (La.5/16/00), , concluded that the proper standard of review for a trial court's failure to advise a defendant of the minimum and maximum penalties before accepting a guilty plea was the harmless error standard, noting that La.Code Crim.P.
  • State v. Burns 828 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Drane 828 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Washington, 29,478 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), .
  • State v. Fairley 822 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    [8] State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Watson 821 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Wiggins 817 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Neely 818 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Johnson 813 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Loyd 810 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.05/16/00), .
  • State v. Edwards 811 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.05/16/00), .
  • State v. Montalban 810 So. 2d 1106 La. 2002
    [4] In State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.5/16/00), , we nevertheless recognized that harmless error analysis was applicable in an instance where the trial court failed to inform the defendant before accepting his guilty plea about the mandatory minimum sentence and that conviction could be used to enhance the penalty for subsequent offenses.
  • State v. Brooks 807 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    See State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.5/16/00), -1166 ; State v. Frickey, 00-294 (La.App.
  • State v. Scott 823 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    App.2d Cir.1/26/00), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/3/00), ; State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Gilliam 807 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Guzman, 99-1753, p. 5 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Frickey, 00-294, p. 12 (La.App.
  • State v. Saylor 802 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    [17] See State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.5/16/00), .
  • State v. Sarrio 803 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.5/16/00), .