Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Guzman, 769 So. 2d 1158.
-
State v. Phayarath
866 So. 2d 332
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
In State v. Guzman, 99-1528, p. 6 (La.5/16/00), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held, “whether a trial court complied with La.C.Cr.P.
-
State v. Volgamore
865 So. 2d 237
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. Cooper
864 So. 2d 892
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. Lingefelt
865 So. 2d 280
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. Jarrett
862 So. 2d 440
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
- State of Louisiana v. David Wayne Wilturner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
-
State v. Wilturner
858 So. 2d 743
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. Kennedy
859 So. 2d 312
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. Jackson
855 So. 2d 989
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. King
856 So. 2d 243
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State of Louisiana v. Albert C. Girtley, Sr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
5/16/00), quoting United States v. Johnson, 1 F.3d 296, 302 (5th Cir. 1993) (en banc) (expressly overruling United States v. Martirosian, 967 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir. 1992) (citing United States v. Bachynsky, 934 F.2d at 1360).
-
State v. Crutchfield
855 So. 2d 822
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Washington, 29,478 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), .
-
State v. Brown
852 So. 2d 1234
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. Eason
850 So. 2d 1090
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Washington, 29,478 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), .
-
State v. Shaw
850 So. 2d 868
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Washington, 29,478 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97)
-
State v. Edison
847 So. 2d 140
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Bradford, 29,519 (La.App.
-
State v. Ford
846 So. 2d 98
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
See also State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Echols, 99-2226 (La.App.
-
State v. Howard
842 So. 2d 1233
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Washington, 29,-478 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), .
-
State v. Mandosia
842 So. 2d 1252
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Washington, 29,478 (La.
-
State v. Anderson
842 So. 2d 1222
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. Vu
846 So. 2d 67
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, p. 9 (La.5/16/00), n. 1 .
-
State v. Green
839 So. 2d 970
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.05/16/00), .
-
State v. Wright
839 So. 2d 1001
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.05/16/00), .
-
State v. Johnson
839 So. 2d 1060
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. Snow
839 So. 2d 988
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. Verdin
845 So. 2d 372
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
See State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Anderson, 98-2977 (La.3/19/99), (per curiam); *376 (La.App.
-
State v. Gleason
836 So. 2d 1165
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. Norris
837 So. 2d 723
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.05/16/00), .
-
State v. Smith
839 So. 2d 165
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Fairley, 02-168 (La.App.
-
State v. Quiambao
833 So. 2d 1103
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. Gay
830 So. 2d 356
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.05/16/00)
-
State v. Moseley
830 So. 2d 354
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
In State v. Stiles, 99-1528 (La.05/16/00), , the supreme court upheld consecutive maximum sentences imposed for multiple counts of aggravated incest with a minor.
-
State v. Gay
830 So. 2d 356
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Guzman, 99-1753 (La.05/16/00)
-
State v. Yates
828 So. 2d 708
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. Sullivan
827 So. 2d 1260
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
[2] However, the supreme court in State v. Guzman, 99-1753, 99-1528 (La.5/16/00), , concluded that the proper standard of review for a trial court's failure to advise a defendant of the minimum and maximum penalties before accepting a guilty plea was the harmless error standard, noting that La.Code Crim.P.
-
State v. Burns
828 So. 2d 147
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. Drane
828 So. 2d 107
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Washington, 29,478 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), .
-
State v. Fairley
822 So. 2d 812
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
[8] State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. Watson
821 So. 2d 618
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. Wiggins
817 So. 2d 405
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. Neely
818 So. 2d 829
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. Johnson
813 So. 2d 1180
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. Loyd
810 So. 2d 1214
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.05/16/00), .
-
State v. Edwards
811 So. 2d 233
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Guzman, 99-1528, 99-1753 (La.05/16/00), .
-
State v. Montalban
810 So. 2d 1106
La. 2002
[4] In State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.5/16/00), , we nevertheless recognized that harmless error analysis was applicable in an instance where the trial court failed to inform the defendant before accepting his guilty plea about the mandatory minimum sentence and that conviction could be used to enhance the penalty for subsequent offenses.
-
State v. Brooks
807 So. 2d 1090
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
See State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.5/16/00), -1166 ; State v. Frickey, 00-294 (La.App.
-
State v. Scott
823 So. 2d 960
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
App.2d Cir.1/26/00), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/3/00), ; State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. Gilliam
807 So. 2d 1024
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Guzman, 99-1753, p. 5 (La.5/16/00), ; State v. Frickey, 00-294, p. 12 (La.App.
-
State v. Saylor
802 So. 2d 937
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
[17] See State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.5/16/00), .
-
State v. Sarrio
803 So. 2d 212
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Guzman, 99-1528 (La.5/16/00), .