Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Alexis, 770 So. 2d 339.

259 citing documents.

State v. Anderson 48 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
However, in State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302, pp. 4-5 (La.10/17/00), -43 (second, third, and fourth alterations in original), the supreme court explained that even sentences mandated by statute may be excessive in a given case: The Legislature enacted the Habitual Offender Law pursuant to its sole authority under Article 3, § I of the Louisiana Constitution to define conduct as cri
State v. Johnson 41 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The Louisiana Supreme Court “has repeatedly held that [the Habitual Offender Act] does not require the State to use a specific | utyye of evidence to carry its burden at an habitual offender hearing and that prior convictions may be proved by any competent evidence.” Payton , 00-2899 at p. 8, 810 So.2d at 1132 (quoting State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), )(emphasis in original).
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Quinn, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Quinn 38 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, 99-3256, p. 4 (La.10/17/00), , 342, cert.
State v. Woods 38 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Payton, 00-2899 at 2, 810 So.2d at 1132; State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), , 344 n. 3, cert.
State v. Wilson 26 So. 3d 210 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Lindsey, 1999-3302 (La.10/17/00), , cert.
State v. Dowell 17 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
10/17/00), ; Johnson , 97-1906 at p. 8, 709 So.2d at 677 .
State v. Briggs 19 So. 3d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Lindsey, 993302, 99-3256, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Hayes 16 So. 3d 604 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Also State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Mead 16 So. 3d 470 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Also State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), .
State of Louisiana v. Connor L. Wood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), cert.
State v. Wood 11 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , cert.
State v. Thomas 13 So. 3d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 10/28/08), (citing State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302, p. 4 (La.10/17/00), , 342, cert.
State v. Capers 998 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Roberts 996 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , 342, cert.
State v. Mead 988 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
See State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), ; Wilson, supra; and State v. Mead, KA 05-40406 (La.
State v. Robbins 986 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Also State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Borden 986 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Jones 975 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 c/w 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Henry 966 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Payton, 00-2899 (La.3/15/02), , quoting State v. Lindsey, 99-3202 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Dorsey 960 So. 2d 1127 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), , 343, cert.
State v. Trackling 958 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), ; Johnson , 97-1906, p. 8, 709 So.2d at 677 .
State v. Taylor 956 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , 342, cert.
State v. Douglas 952 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
See State v. Lindsey, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/17/00), (Johnson, J., dissenting).
State v. Thomas 948 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Lindsey, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/17/00), ; Wade, supra .
State v. Chandler 939 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
See also, State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , cert.
State v. Robert 931 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Gill 931 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Williams 932 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
See also State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Hall 929 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Johnson, supra; State v. Wade, 36,295 (La.App.2d Cir.10/23/02), , writ denied, 2002-2875 (La.4/4/03), .
State v. Hebert 930 So. 2d 1039 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Mead 927 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
See State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Wilson, supra .
State v. Cuccia 933 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 11/10/99), , reversed on other grounds, State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Smart 926 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , 342, cert.
State v. Robertson 925 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Additionally, the Supreme Court in State v. Payton, 2000-2899, p. 8 (La.3/15/02), , citing State v. Lindsey, 1999-3302, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), , 344 reiterated: This Court has repeatedly held that the Habitual Offender Act does not require the State to use a specific type of evidence to carry its burden at an habitual offender hearing and that prior convictions may be proved by any competent evidence.” As such, the trial court did not err in adjudicating the
State v. Jefferson 922 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), ; Johnson , 97-1906 at p. 8, 709 So.2d at 677 .
State v. Jarreau 921 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
More recently, in State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , the Supreme Court followed the guidelines set forth in the Johnson case.
State v. McGinnis 917 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 6/1/99) , , writ denied, 99-1937 (La.10/13/00), .
State v. Lee 909 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Walter Johnson, supra ; State v. Wade, supra .
State v. Albert 914 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Ashford 913 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
.The defendant must show that “because of unusual circumstances this defendant is a victim of the legislature’s failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to the culpability of the offender, the gravity of the offense, and the circumstances of the case.” State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Stevenson 908 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
[20] State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , 345 cert.
State v. Thomas 904 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, p. 9 (La.10/17/00), (emphasis as found in the original), cert.
State v. Robinson 905 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , 342, cert.
State v. Condley 904 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 6/1/99) , , writ denied, 99-1937 (La.10/13/00), .
State v. Fleming 902 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 c/w 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , 343, cert.
State v. Lai 902 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 6/1/99) , 738 * writ denied, 99-1937 (La.10/13/00), .
State v. Richardson 896 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Johnson, supra; State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Hensley 900 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
[39] State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 c/w 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , 343, cert.
State v. Lowery 890 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, 99-3256, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), , 343, certiorari denied, 532 U.S. 1010 , 121 S.Ct.