Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Alexis, 770 So. 2d 339.

259 citing documents.

State v. Bratton 161 So. 3d 937 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Lindsey, 1999-3802 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Williams 158 So. 3d 107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
for declaring such a sentence excessive” because the “defendant’s history of violent or non-violent offenses has already been taken into account under the Habitual Offender Law for third and fourth offenders, which punishes third and fourth offenders with a history of violent offenses more severely than those with a history of non-violent offenses.” State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Small 147 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Ladd 146 So. 3d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Price 140 So. 3d 1212 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Burks, 47,587 (La.App.2d Cir.1/16/13), , writ denied, 13-0424 (La.7/31/13), .
State v. Adams 139 So. 3d 1106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Dean 140 So. 3d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , 342, cert.
State of Louisiana v. Fermichael Harrison La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Thomas 136 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, 99-3256, p. 4 (La.10/17/00), -43 .
State of Louisiana v. Derrick L. Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00)
State v. Harris 156 So. 3d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Pernell 127 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
where the legislature’s sentence is not meaningfully tailored to the offender, the gravity of the offense, and the circumstances of the case); State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, p. 9 (La.10/17/00), -346 ; Sepulvado, 367 So.2d at 764 .
State v. Sims 123 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
incing evidence that he is exceptional, which in this context means that because of unusual circumstances he is a victim of the legislature’s failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to the culpability of the offender, the gravity of the offense, and the circumstances of the case.” Landfair , p. 18, 70 So.3d at 1072 (citing State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 00-3302, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), , 343 and Johnson , 97-1906, p. 8, 709 So.2d at 677 ).
State v. Quinn 123 So. 3d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The defendant must show that “because of unusual circumstances this defendant is a victim of the legislature’s failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to the culpability of the offender, |?Bthe gravity of the offense, and the circumstances of the case.” State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Hackett 122 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
10/17/00), ; State v. Johnson, supra
State v. Richards 114 So. 3d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), .
State of Louisiana v. Aaron Orlando Richards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
2 State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00)
State of Louisiana v. Simcoe Cole AKA Simco W. Cole La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Cole 156 So. 3d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , 343 cert.
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS HAROLD OZENE A/K/A JAMIE OZENE A/K/A HAROLD J. BOOTE A/K/A HAROLD J. OZENE A/K/A … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Wayne Kevin Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Jones 107 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, pp. 4-5 (La.10/17/00), , 342-43, cert.
State v. Lewis 107 So. 3d 750 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
In State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Michael W. Hood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Taylor 97 So. 3d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, p. 7 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Dorsey 94 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Taylor , 06-839 at 4, 956 So.2d at 27 (citing State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , 342, cert, denied, 532 U.S. 1010 , 121 S.Ct.
State v. Paul 90 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, 99-3256, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Underdonk 92 So. 3d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , 344-45 n. 3, cert.
State v. Horne 88 So. 3d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, 99-3302, p. 4 (La.10/17/00), , 342, cert.
State v. Buckley 88 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, p. 5, (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Proctor 80 So. 3d 527 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
State v. Wade 77 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , 343, cert.
State v. Landfair 70 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), ; Johnson, 97-1906, p. 8, 709 So.2d at 677 .
State v. Smith 71 So. 3d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Linsdey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Winslow, supra.
State of Louisiana v. Travis Bourda La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
10/17/00), -46, (footnotes omitted)(alteration in original) the supreme court stated: 2 The Legislature enacted the Habitual Offender Law pursuant to its sole authority under Article 3, § I of the Louisiana Constitution to define conduct as criminal and to provide penal
State v. Bobo 77 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Lindsey, 1999-3302 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. BOURDA 70 So. 3d 82 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, pp. 4-9 (La.10/17/00), -46 , (foot *84 notes omitted)(alteration in original) the supreme court stated: |sThe Legislature enacted the Habitual Offender Law pursuant to its sole authority under Article 3, § I of the Louisiana Constitution to define conduct as criminal and to provide penalties for such conduct.
State v. Lewis 69 So. 3d 604 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Johnson, supra; State v. Henry, 42,416 (La.App.2d Cir.9/19/07), ; State v. Wade, supra.
State of Louisiana v. Carol Wayne Crooks, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
10/17/00), -43 (second, third, and fourth alterations in original), the supreme court explained that even sentences mandated by statute may be excessive in a given case: The Legislature enacted the Habitual Offender Law pursuant to its sole authority under Article 3, § I of the Louisiana Constitutio
State of Louisiana v. Jarman Gerard Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Jones 63 So. 3d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302, 99-3256, pp. 4-5 (La.10/17/00), , 342-43, cert.
State v. Hall 64 So. 3d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
10/17/00), ; Johnson , 97-1906, p. 8, 709 So.2d at 677 .
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS OTERREL J. BOUTTE AKA O'TERREL BOUTTE AKA O'TERRELL BOUTTE La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Boutte 58 So. 3d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Phillips 61 So. 3d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, p.J^ (La.10/17/00), ; Johnson , 97-1906, p. 8, 709 So.2d at 677 .
State v. Welch 57 So. 3d 442 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
He concludes that the sum of these facts proves that he is “exceptional,” a “victim of the legislature’s failure to assign sentences that are meaningfully tailored to the culpability of the offender, the gravity of the offense, and the circumstances of the case.” State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; State v. Lindsey, 99-3256 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Vincent 56 So. 3d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In State v. Lindsey, 99-3302 (La.10/17/00), , the Court recognized Dorthe y limited holding: We held [in State v. Johnson, 96-1263 (La.6/28/96), ] that “[a] court may only depart from the minimum sentence if it finds that there is clear and convincing evidence in the particular ease before it which would rebut [the] presumption of constitutionalit
State v. Winslow 55 So. 3d 910 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Lindsey, 1999-3302 (La.10/17/00), .
State v. Green 52 So. 3d 253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Lindsey, 99-3256, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), ; Johnson , 97-1906, p. 8, 709 So.2d at 677 .
State of Louisiana v. Steven Mark Marc" Anderson " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
10/17/00), -43 (second, third, and fourth alterations in original), the supreme court explained that even sentences mandated by statute may be excessive in a given case: The Legislature enacted the Habitual Offender Law pursuant to its sole authority under Article 3, § I of the Louisiana Constitution