Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Collor, 762 So. 2d 96.

28 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jkari Campbell La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 4 Cir. 4/26/00), ).
State of Louisiana Versus Joachim J. Cotton La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
App. 4 Cir. 4/26/00), writ denied, 00-1487 (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Lanard A. Lavigne La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 4/26/00), writ denied, 00-1487 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Trae Williams La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 4/26/00); this Court discussed the Allen charge and the reasons it may be problematic, stating, “First, the charge emphasizes that the jury has a duty to reach a verdict, implying that the trial judge will not accept a mistrial.
State of Louisiana v. Hugh Gilliam La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
App. 4 Cir. 4/26/00), ).
State of Louisiana Versus Argentina Mesa La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 4/26/00); writ denied, 00-1487 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Wayne Jackson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
State v. Bell 197 So. 3d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Thomas 106 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Cooks 81 So. 3d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Parker 76 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Payton 68 So. 3d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Kent Dale Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 4/26/00), writ denied, 00-1487 (La.
State v. Simon 62 So. 3d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 4/26/00), , writ denied, 00-1487 (La.3/9/01), .
State v. Foster 44 So. 3d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 4/26/00), , writ denied, 00-1487 (La.3/9/01), ).
State v. Bradley 995 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Samuel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 4/26/00), writ denied, 00- 1487 (La.
State v. Samuel 984 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 4/26/00) , , writ denied, 00-1487 (La.3/9/01), , where the appellate court held that the defendant waived his right to challenge the fact that the jury was allowed to take a transcript of his confession into deliberations because he failed to contemporaneously object.
State v. Jaramillo 953 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 4/26/00) , , writ denied, 00-1487 (La.3/9/01), , where the appellate court held that the defendant waived his right to challenge the fact that the jury was allowed to take a transcript of his confession into deliberations because he failed to contemporaneously object.
State of Louisiana v. Mark Jaramillo La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 4/26/00), writ denied, 00-1487 (La.
State v. Batiste 947 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. Williams 925 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 4/26/00), , 103 noted: Thus, in reviewing defendant's claim that the evidence supports a manslaughter verdict, this Court must determine whether a rational trier of fact, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, could have found that the mitigating factors were not established by a preponderance of t
State v. Eugene 866 So. 2d 985 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 4/26/00) , , writ denied, 00-1487 (La.3/9/01), , the appellate court explained: The Allen charge originated in Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492 , 17 S.Ct.
State v. Cheavious 862 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Finch 853 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Robinson 820 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
4 Cir. 4/26/00), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/9/01), .
State v. Alvarez 792 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4 Cir. 4/26/00) , , this Court addressed the “Allen” charge or “dynamite” charge.
State v. Bloodworth 790 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001