Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Miller, 776 So. 2d 396.

74 citing documents.

State v. Woodard 977 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Lizotte 977 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Buckenberger 984 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
See State v. Miller, 99-0192 (La.9/6/00), , cert.
State v. Rick 977 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Lee 976 So. 2d 109 La. 2008
See e.g., State v. Bowie, 00-3344 (La.4/3/02), (defendant robbed victim over the age of 70 and strangled him with his shoelaces and an electrical cord); State v. Cosey, 97-2020 (La.11/28/00), (defendant raped and slashed throat of 12-year-old victim, stomping her face as he left); State v. Miller, 99-0192 (La.9/6/00), (defendant robbed and raped 67-year-old woman in her home, then killed her by repeatedly stabbing her, slashing her throat, and dropping a couch on her face); State v. Tilley, 99-0
State v. GROOT 973 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. MacK 973 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Brister 966 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Blank 955 So. 2d 90 La. 2007
9/6/00), , summarized the import of Divers, Maxie, Robertson, and Ross , as follows: In each of these cases, while the prospective jurors stated a willingness, in the abstract, to consider a life sentence, defense counsel established the jurors' unwillingness or inability, because of the aggravating factors in the particular c
State v. Verret 960 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Miller, 99-0192, p. 24 (La.9/6/00), , cert.
State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006
192 , 151 L.Ed.2d 135 (2001) (cause challenge properly denied for juror who was not unwilling to consider a life sentence and would not automatically vote for the death penalty); State v. Miller, 99-0192, pp. 18-19 (La.9/6/00), , cert.
State v. Juniors 915 So. 2d 291 La. 2005
State v. Divers, 94-0756, pp. 7-8 (La.9/5/96), ; State v. Miller, 99-0192, p. 8 (La.9/6/00), .
State v. Magee 916 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Miller, 99-0192, p. 14 (La.9/6/00), -406 , cert.
State v. Jacobs 855 So. 2d 324 La. 2003
See State v. Miller, 99-0192, p. 27 (La.9/6/00), (“The requirement of a pretrial determination of admissibility does not encompass an evi-dentiary hearing at which victim impact witnesses are called to testify.”).
State v. Gardner 844 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Miller, 99-0192 (La.9/6/00), , cert.
State v. Louviere 833 So. 2d 885 La. 2002
State v. Miller, 99-0192, p. 30 (La.9/6/00), .
State v. Bridgewater 823 So. 2d 877 La. 2002
State v. Miller, 99-0192, p. 30 (La.9/6/00), .
State v. Ball 824 So. 2d 1089 La. 2002
See State v. Miller, 99-0192 (La.9/6/00), , Calogero, C.J., dissenting.
State v. LaCaze 824 So. 2d 1063 La. 2002
State v. Miller, 99-0192, p. 30 (La.9/6/00), .
State v. Ledet 792 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Miller, 99-0192 (La.9/6/00) .
State v. Jacobs 789 So. 2d 1280 La. 2001
Recently, in State v. Miller, 99-0192, p. 4 (La.9/6/00), , we noted that: Perhaps the most difficult tasks for the trial judge in ensuring the impartiality of a capital juror are handling the death qualification portion of the voir dire and ruling on challenges for cause to a prospective juror who has expressed his or her views toward the death penalty.
State v. Higgins 802 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Miller, 99-0192 (La.9/6/00), , cert.
State v. Broaden 780 So. 2d 349 La. 2001
State v. Miller, 99-0192 (La.9/6/00), .
State v. Taylor 781 So. 2d 1205 La. 2001
citing Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 , 25 L.Ed.