No. 2003-KK-1539 Precedential Processed

State v. Jacobs

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed October 10, 2003 · 855 So. 2d 324

Cited by

Explained in 1

State of Louisiana v. Tristan Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Danny Trey Crossland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Larry J. Cooper, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Demyron L. Skinner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Michael R. Suydam, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State v. Tutson 270 So. 3d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Michael Ja'rel Tutson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Mario Jamal Viltz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Viltz 261 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Robert Earl Sanders La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Sanders 238 So. 3d 1098 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Brown v. Patient Comp. Fund Oversight Bd. 241 So. 3d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018

all 56 citing documents »

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

State v. Bernard 608 So. 2d 966
State v. Miller 776 So. 2d 396

Opinion text

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial *325 Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 96-7161; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 03-K-396. Granted. The trial court afforded the defendant the contradictory hearing required under State v. Bernard, 608 So.2d 966, 973 (1992) when it ruled on the merits of defense motions nos. 86, 87, 88 on January 27, 2003. See State v. Miller, 99-0192, p. 27 (La.9/6/00), 776 So.2d 396, 412 (“The requirement of a pretrial determination of admissibility does not encompass an evi-dentiary hearing at which victim impact witnesses are called to testify.”). Accordingly, we remand the instant application to the court of appeal for treatment of the trial court’s denial of defense motions nos. 86, 87, 88 on the merits. KNOLL, J., recused.