Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Gillet, 763 So. 2d 725.

19 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Robert H. Miller, III A/K/A Robert Miller, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    4 Cir. 5/10/00), -29: This Court has stated that “an appellate court will not reverse its pretrial determinations .
  • State of Louisiana v. Desmond Dangelo Dugas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    4 Cir. 5/10/00), -29: This Court has stated that “an appellate court will not reverse its pretrial determinations .
  • State v. Trung Le 243 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State ex rel. H.J. 238 So. 3d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 4 Cir. 5/10/00), , 728.
  • State v. Wells 203 So. 3d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Berniard 163 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Fields 151 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Robertson 136 So. 3d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 5/10/00), , 728: Under the law-of-the-case doctrine, an appellate court will not reverse its pretrial determinations unless the defendant presents new evidence tending to show that the decision was patently erroneous and produced an unjust result.
  • State ex rel. A.S. 156 So. 3d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • RJAM, Inc. v. Miletello 103 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Gillet, 99-2474 (La.App.4th Cir.5/10/00), .
  • State v. Golden 95 So. 3d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Duncan 91 So. 3d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Molineux 76 So. 3d 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 5/10/00), , 728-29: This Court has stated that “an appellate court will not reverse its 14pretrial determinations ...
  • State v. Santamarina 51 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 5/10/00), , 728-29: This Court has stated that “an appellate court will not reverse its pretrial determinations ...
  • State v. Rose 925 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    4 Cir. 5/10/00), , (La.App.
  • State v. Hunter 907 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Hollimon 900 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    4 *1001 Cir. 5/10/00), -729 , wherein the appellate court would not reverse its prior decision reversing the trial court's granting of a motion to produce confidential informant, where no new evidence was introduced to suggest that the prior decision was erroneous and defendant admitted at trial that the informant was not in the restroo
  • State v. Newman 879 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    4 Cir. 5/10/00) , , this Court discussed the law of the case doctrine as follows.
  • State v. Baudier 789 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 5/10/00) , ; State v. Nelson, 98-2405 (La.App.