Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ballay, 757 So. 2d 115.

26 citing documents.

  • Vs. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    5 Cir. 2/29/00), writ denied, 00–908 (La.4/20/01)
  • Vs. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    5 Cir. 2/29/00), writ denied, 00–908 (La.4/20/01)
  • State v. Crossley 117 So. 3d 585 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    5th Cir.2/29/00), , writ denied, 2000-0908 (La.4/20/01), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher K. Mayeux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 2/29/00), writ denied, 00-908 (La.
  • State v. Mayeux 128 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    5 Cir. 2/29/00) , , writ denied, 00-908 (La.4/20/01), 790 So.2d_y.3,] and [State v.] Amaud [, ], the State failed to do so.
  • State v. Dyer 101 So. 3d 38 La. 2012
    5 Cir. 2/29/00) , -30 ; State v. Ross, 97-0357, p. 6 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Taurean Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 2/29/00), writ denied, 00-908 (La.
  • State v. Jackson 92 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 2/29/00) , , writ denied, 00-908 (La.4/20/01), , the defendant appealed his conviction of theft of goods between $100.00 and $500.00 and sentence of life imprisonment as a fourth felony offender.
  • State ex rel. S.L. 94 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    5 Cir. 2/29/00) , , writ denied, 00-908 (La.4/20/01), .
  • State v. Seals 83 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 2/29/00) , , writ denied, 00-0908 (La.4/20/01), , 123 .
  • State of Louisiana v. Calvin Charles Barfield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 2/29/00), -30, writ denied, 00-908 (La.
  • State v. Barfield 81 So. 3d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    5 Cir. 2/29/00) , -30 , writ denied, 00-908 (La.4/20/01), , the fifth circuit pointed out that evidence not under the control of a party is not subject to this presumption: |1(iThe defendant argues that the trial court erred in failing to give the jury a special jury charge on legal presumptions that states “that evide
  • State v. Woods 38 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    5 Cir. 2/29/00) , , writ denied, 00-0908 (La.4/20/01), , the defendant was convicted of theft of goods between $100 and $500.
  • State v. Ayo 7 So. 3d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 2/29/00), , writ denied, 00-0908 (La.4/20/01), .
  • State v. Galliano 945 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    5 Cir. 2/29/00) , , writ denied, 00-0908 (La.4/20/01), .
  • State v. Smothers 927 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    5 Cir. 2/29/00) , , writ denied, 00-0908 (La.4/20/01), .
  • State v. Paul 924 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    5 Cir. 2/29/00) , , writ denied, 00-0908 (La.4/20/01), .
  • State v. Williams 904 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    5th Cir.1/28/97), , writ denied, 00-0908 (La.4/20/01), , witnesses testified that the defendant attempted to exit a store with merchandise without paying.
  • State v. Smith 888 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    5 Cir. 2/29/00) , , writ denied, 00-0908 (La.4/20/01), .
  • State v. Falkins 880 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    5 Cir. 2/29/00) , , writ denied, 00-0908 (La.4/20/01), .
  • State v. Williams 866 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    5th Cir.2/29/00), , writ denied, 00-0908 (La.4/20/01), .
  • State v. Antoine 841 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    5 Cir. 2/29/00) , , writ denied, 00-0908 (La.4/20/01), .
  • State v. Kelly 800 So. 2d 978 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    5 Cir. 2/29/00) , , writ denied, 00-908 (La.4/20/01), 2001 La.
  • State v. Bell 781 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    App. 5 Cir.2/29/00), , in which this Court found that one of the defendant's assignments of error had been abandoned.
  • State v. Weidenbacker 782 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    5 Cir. 2/29/00) , , witnesses testified that the defendant attempted to exit the store with merchandise for which he had not paid.
  • State v. Jones 769 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    5 Cir. 2/29/00) , , this Court stated: Mistrial is a drastic remedy and, except in instances in which mistrial is mandatory, is warranted only when trial error results in substantial prejudice to defendant, depriving him of a reasonable expectation of a fair trial.