DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fobbs, 744 So. 2d 1274.

67 citing documents.

  • State v. Alvey 839 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), , the Supreme Court, in a per curiam decision, stated: 114 that “the review of sentencing, including sentencing under R.S.
  • State v. Hernandez 839 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), ; State v. Temple, 01-655, p. 15 (La.App.
  • State v. Paddio 832 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), .
  • State v. Martin 809 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    See State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), , and 99-0073 (La.App.
  • State v. Bowen 806 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    [16] -1281 (La.1993); State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), .
  • State v. Temple 806 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), ; State v. Brown, 01-160 (La.App.
  • State v. Kirkland 798 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Brown, 01-160 (La.App.
  • State v. Brown 788 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), .
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    (mandatory minimum sentences provided by the Habitual Offender Law); State v. Fobbs, 99-0124 (La.9/24/99), (mandatory minimum sentence for possession with intent to distribute cocaine); State v. Russell, 98-2773, pp. 9-11 (La.App.
  • State v. Washington 788 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    (mandatory minimum sentences provided by the Habitual Offender Law); State v. Fobbs, 99-0124 (La.9/24/99), (mandatory minimum sentence for possession with intent to distribute cocaine); State v. Russell, 98-2773, pp. 9-11 (La.App.
  • State v. Spencer 808 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    See State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), (per curiam); State v. Henderson, 99-1945, p. 19 n. 5 (La.App.
  • State v. Derouin 778 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    The supreme court further recognized in State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99); , that the holding in Dorthey was not restricted to only sentences imposed pursuant to the habitual offender law.
  • State v. Green 779 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99)
  • State v. Henderson 762 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    See State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), ; State v. Davis, 94-2332, pp. 11-12 (La.App.
  • State v. Dupart 769 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    In State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), , the Supreme Court, in a per curiam decision, stated: *19 that “the review of sentencing, including sentencing under R.S.
  • State v. Russell 764 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    However, in State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), , the Supreme Court stated: that "the review of sentencing, including sentencing under R.S.
  • State v. Fobbs 747 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), .