DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fobbs, 744 So. 2d 1274.

67 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Robert J. Davis La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
    9/24/99), (holding that La.
  • State of Louisiana v. John Honore La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
    9/24/99), (per curiam) (noting that “[o]ur observation in Dorthey, that ‘the review of sentencing, including sentencing under R.S.
  • State Of Louisiana v. Rogelio Ledezma La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
    9/ 24/ 99), (per curiam); State v. Collins, 2009- 1617 La.
  • State Of Louisiana v. David Theodore Ward, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
    9/ 24/ 99), ( per curiam).
  • State Of Louisiana v. Quentin LaJaurne Coleman La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
    9/ 24199), ( per curiam); see State v. Collins, 2009- 1617 ( La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Nataja Shermaine Portalis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
  • Laura Eugene Versus Frederick M. Boutte, Warden La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
    9/24/99), (per curiam); State v. Temple, 01-655 (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus Teddy Chester La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
  • State v. Kennon 273 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
  • State v. Vaughn 259 So. 3d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    9/24/99), (per curiam); State v. Collins, 09-1617 (La.App.
  • State v. Livous 259 So. 3d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    9/24/99), ( per curiam ).
  • State v. Barrett 247 So. 3d 164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. Adam Comeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    9/24/99), (per curiam); State v. Collins, 2009-1617 (La.
  • State v. Comeaux 239 So. 3d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    9/24/99), (per curiam); State v. Collins , 2009-1617 (La.
  • State v. Thompson 245 So. 3d 302 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Scott 228 So. 3d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    9/24/99), (per curiam); State v. Collins, 2009-1617 (La.
  • State v. McCasland 218 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    9/24/99), (per curiam); State v. Collins, 09-1617 (La.App.
  • State v. Thomas 209 So. 3d 234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    9/24/99), ; State v. Chandler, 41,063 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert E. Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    .without legal justification.” In Berniard, the fifth circuit noted: In State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), relative to downward departures from mandatory sentences in a habitual offender case is not limited to those sentences.
  • State v. Smith 204 So. 3d 1003 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    9/24/99), , 1275 , 1280 relative to downward departures from mandatory sentences in a habitual offender case is not limited to those.
  • State v. Eley 203 So. 3d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Isidore 193 So. 3d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    See State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), (per | (¡curiam); State v. Collins, 2009-1617 (La.App.
  • State v. Eby 248 So. 3d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    9/24/99), ( per curiam ).
  • State v. York 121 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    See State v. Fobbs, 1999-1024 (La.9/24/99), ; State v. Chandler, 41,063 (La.App.
  • State v. Lewis 110 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    See State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), ; State v. Chandler, 41,063 (La.App.2d Cir.9/8/06), , writ denied, 2006-2554 (La.5/11/07), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Alfonzo Jewade Segura La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    The supreme court expanded this holding to all sentences in State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99)
  • State v. Johnson 91 So. 3d 1213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), ; State v. Chandler, 41,063 (La.App.2d Cir.9/8/06), , writ denied, 2006-2554 (La.5/11/07), .
  • State v. Richardson 71 So. 3d 492 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), ; State v. Chandler, 41,063 (La.App.2d Cir.9/8/06), , writ denied, 06-2554 (La.5/11/07), .
  • State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    See State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), (per curiam).
  • State v. Williams 54 So. 3d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), (per curiam).
  • State v. Jones 46 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Fobbs, 1999-1024 (La.9/24/99), ; State v. Chandler, 41,063 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. R. R. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. RR 37 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    The supreme court expanded this holding to all sentences in State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), .
  • State v. R.R. 37 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    The supreme court expanded this holding to all sentences in State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), .
  • State v. Collins 35 So. 3d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    See State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), (per curiam); State v. Henderson, 99-1945 (La.App.
  • State v. Woods 16 So. 3d 1279 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    See State v. Fobbs, 1999-1024 (La.9/24/99), ; State v. Chandler, 41,063 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Connor L. Wood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99)
  • State v. Wood 11 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), .
  • State v. Morrison 999 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    See State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), ; State v. Johnson, 97-1906 (La.3/4/98), ; (La.
  • State v. Arabie 982 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    [13] State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), (per curiam).
  • State v. Beaner 974 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    See State v. Fobbs, XXXX-XXXX (La.9/24/99), ; State v. Chandler, 41,063 (La.App.2d Cir.9/8/06), , writ denied, 2006-2554 (La.5/11/07), .
  • State v. Brown 965 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    See State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), ; State v. Chandler, 41,063 (La.App.2d Cir.9/8/06), , writ denied, 2006-2554 (La.5/11/07), .
  • State v. Hill 956 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    See State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), ; State v. Chandler, 41,063 (La.App.2d Cir.9/8/06), .
  • State v. Craig 944 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    See State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), (per curiam); State v. Davis, 94-2332, pp. 11-12 (La.App.
  • State v. Chandler 939 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Specifically, he argues that the trial court erred in refusing to allow testimony regarding mitigating circumstances at sentencing hearings in violation of State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), , and in imposing a constitutionally excessive sentence.
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher Ross La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99)
  • State v. Ross 861 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), .
  • State v. Emanuel-Dunn 868 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    See State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), (per curiam); State v. Davis, 94-2332, pp. 11-12 (La.App.
  • State v. Berniard 860 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    In State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), , 1275 , 1280 relative to downward departures from mandatory sentences in a habitual offender case is not limited to those sentences.
  • State v. Thomas 841 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    State v. Fobbs, 99-1024 (La.9/24/99), .