DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Chinigo v. Geismar Marine, Inc., 512 So. 2d 487.

17 citing documents.

  • Rory Anthony Miller and Jessica Eustis Miller v. Acadian Ambulance Service of New Orleans, L.L.C. and Xyz Insurance … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
    App. 4 Cir. 1988); Chinigo v. Geismar Marine, Inc., (La.
  • Gonzales v. Kissner 24 So. 3d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Chinigo v. Geismar Marine, Inc., (La.App.
  • Henry v. Barlow 901 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    The assumption rationale bars recovery from most dependant risks except when (1) the dependant risks encountered by the professional rescuer are so extraordinary that it cannot be said that the parties intended the rescuers to assume them, Chinigo v. Geismar Marine, Inc., (La.App.
  • Randy James Henry, Etc. v. Danny L. Barlow La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    The assumption rationale bars recovery from most dependant risks except when (1) the dependant risks encountered by the professional rescuer are so extraordinary that it cannot be said that the parties intended the rescuers to assume them, Chinigo v. Geismar Marine, Inc., (La.App.
  • In Re New Orleans Train Car Leakage Fire Litigation 795 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Accord Chinigo v. Geismar Marine, Inc., (La.App.
  • Holloway v. Midland Risk Ins. Co. 759 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    The assumption rationale bars recovery from most dependent risks except when (1) the dependent risks encountered by the professional rescuers are so extraordinary that it cannot be said that the parties intended the rescuers to assume them, Chinigo v. Geismar Marine, Inc., (La.App.
  • Mullins v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 697 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    The assumption rationale bars recovery from most dependent risks except when (1) the dependent risks encountered by the professional *753 rescuers are so extraordinary that it cannot be said that the parties intended the rescuers to assume them, Chinigo v. Geismar Marine, Inc., (La.
  • Meunier v. Pizzo 696 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    4 Cir.1988); Chinigo v. Geismar Marine, Inc., (La.App.
  • Brumfield v. Guilmino 633 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    Chinigo v. Geismar Marine, Inc., (La.App.
  • Jordan v. Intercontinental Bulktank Corp. 621 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Worley v. Winston 550 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    Sayes v. Pilgrim Manor Nursing Home, Inc., supra; Chinigo v. Geismar Marine, Inc., (La.
  • Sayes v. Pilgrim Manor Nursing Home, Inc. 536 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    However, in Chinigo v. Geismar Marine, Inc., (La.App.
  • Spicuzza v. Fonseca 537 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Chinigo v. Geismar Marine, Inc., (La.App.
  • Griffin v. Tenneco Oil Co. 531 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    We find only one case which dealt with the statute, Chinigo v. Geismar Marine, Inc., (La.App.
  • McCrossen v. Renovate, Inc. 528 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    The judgment granting the motions for summary judgment cites and obviously heavily relies on Chinigo v. Geismar Marine, Inc., (La.App.
  • Chinigo v. Geismar Marine, Inc. 514 So. 2d 457 La. 1987
    Prior report: La.App., .
  • Chinigo v. Geismar Marine, Inc. 514 So. 2d 457 La. 1987
    *458 Prior report: La.App., .