Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brossette, 634 So. 2d 1309.
-
State of Louisiana Versus Frederick Seymore, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
App. 3d Cir. 3/2/94), -15, writ denied, 94-802 (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. David Billy Parker, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3d Cir. 3/2/94), writ denied, 94-0802 (La.
-
State v. Parker
270 So. 3d 759
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3d Cir. 3/2/94), , 1317, writ denied, 94-0802 (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. David Billy Parker, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir.), writ denied, 94-0802 (La.6/24/94), this court found no error when the trial judge excused a juror, over defense objection, who brought to his attention an employment relation with a witness who testified by stipulation.
-
State v. Parker
258 So. 3d 883
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
3 Cir.), , writ denied , 94-0802 (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Vernon Mullins
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
This court has consistently held that “[A]n expert witness may testify based on information obtained from others and the method of testing affects only the weight to be afforded the expert’s conclusion.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. v. L. G.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 3/2/94), writ denied, 94-802 (La.
-
Tanya White v. Progressive Security Ins. Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 3/2/94), writ denied, 94-0802 (La.
-
White v. Progressive Security Ins. Co.
6 So. 3d 860
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 3/2/94) , , writ denied, 94-0802 (La.6/24/94), .
- Mel McDaniel v. Carencro Lions Club La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- McDaniel v. Carencro Lions Club 934 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Deangelo Tennors
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir.), writ denied, 94-0802 (La.
-
State v. Tennors
923 So. 2d 823
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir.), , writ denied, 94-0802 (La.6/24/94), , this court found no error when the trial judge excused a juror, over defense objection, who brought to his attention an employment relation with a witness who testified by stipulation.
-
State of Louisiana v. Juan R. Vidaurri
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 3/2/94), writ denied, 94-0802 (La.
-
State v. Vidaurri
919 So. 2d 803
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 3/2/94) , , writ denied, 94-0802 (La.6/24/94), .
-
Mark Taylor v. State of La, Thru the Dotd
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 3/2/94), writ denied, 94- 0802 (La.
-
Taylor v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP.
879 So. 2d 307
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
App. 3 Cir. 3/2/94), , writ denied, 94-0802 (La.6/24/94), .
-
State v. Paddio
832 So. 2d 1120
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 3/2/94) , , writ denied, 94-802 (La.6/24/94), .
-
Bolton v. BE & K CONST.
822 So. 2d 29
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 3/2/94), , writ denied, 94-0802 (La.6/24/94), .
-
State v. Johnson
759 So. 2d 1052
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
App. 3rd Cir. 3/2/94), , writ denied, 94-0802 (La.6/24/94), .
-
State v. Derouselle
745 So. 2d 767
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
3 Cir. 3/2/94) , , writ denied, 94-0802 (La.6/24/94), , the trial court dismissed a juror who had sat through the whole trial after the juror expressed employment concerns because a defense character witness was her supervisor at work.
-
State v. Pooler
696 So. 2d 22
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
3 Cir. 3/2/94) ; , writ denied, 94-0802 (La.
-
State v. Gibson
693 So. 2d 286
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
3 Cir. 3/2/94); , writ denied, 94-0802 (La.6/24/94); .
-
State v. Smith
687 So. 2d 529
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
App. 3 Cir. 3/2/94); , writ denied, 94-0802 (La.6/24/94); .
-
Barrett v. TL James & Co.
671 So. 2d 1186
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
3d Cir. 3/2/94), , writ denied 94-0802 (La.
-
State v. Quatrevingt
670 So. 2d 197
La. 1996
3d Cir. 3/2/94); , writ denied, 94-0802 (La.
-
State v. Stacy
665 So. 2d 390
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
3d Cir. 3/2/94), , writ denied, 94-0802 (La.
-
State v. Lynch
655 So. 2d 470
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
3d Cir. 3/2/94), , writ denied, 94-0802 (La.
- State v. Busby 653 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
-
State v. Stelly
645 So. 2d 804
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
3rd Cir. 3/2/94), , this court stated: An expert witness may testify based on information obtained from others and the method of testing affects only the weight to be afforded the expert's conclusion.