Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. James, 670 So. 2d 461.

109 citing documents.

State v. Sinegal 97 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Jason L. Walton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 2/14/96), citing United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 104 S.Ct.
State v. Walton 87 So. 3d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 2/14/96), , citing United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 , 104 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. v. L. G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Paul B. Stephan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Stephan 79 So. 3d 1175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Russell Gene Ware, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Ware 80 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Garry Wayne McClinton, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. G. T., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. GT, JR. 71 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. R. K. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. R.K. 64 So. 3d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Alex P. Papillion La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Papillion 63 So. 3d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Jason Allen Lomax La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Clyde A. Bowens La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. James Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Jones 45 So. 3d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Mark A. Griffin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Quentin Truehill La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. TRUEHILL 38 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Griffin 41 So. 3d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Keyowaski M. Doucet La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Doucet 36 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Edward L. Christien La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Christien 29 So. 3d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Willie J. Beaudion La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/14/96), (citations omitted).
State v. Beaudion 27 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/14/96), (citations omitted).
State v. JBB 25 So. 3d 255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/14/96), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. J.B. B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/14/96), (citations omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Scotty L. Webre La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Webre 21 So. 3d 1154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Moss 10 So. 3d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Anthony A. Tapp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Tapp 8 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State in the Interest of J. L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Creamer 980 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Larry Allen Creamer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Robert Thomas Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Smith 969 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Brown 966 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Robert Wayne Brown La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Betty Findlay La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Findlay 949 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Jody" Duplichan, Jr. " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 2/14/96), this court explained: In order to prove that counsel was ineffective, the defendant must meet the two-pronged test enunciated by the Supreme Court.
State v. Duplichan 945 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 2/14/96), , this court explained: In order to prove that counsel was ineffective, the defendant must meet the two-pronged test enunciated by the Supreme Court.
State of Louisiana v. Charles Ray Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Sammie Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 2/14/96), this court stated: In order to prove that counsel was ineffective, the defendant must meet the two-pronged test enunciated by the Supreme Court.
State v. Davis 918 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 2/14/96), , this court stated: In order to prove that counsel was ineffective, the defendant must meet the two-pronged test enunciated by the Supreme Court.