DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Vaughn, 448 So. 2d 915.

23 citing documents.

  • Criticized State of Louisiana Versus Rene Fuentes La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
    The court noted that after an officer stopped the defendant, the officer confirmed the defendant’s “obvious and significant impairment.” The appellate court acknowledged that it was a close call but nevertheless ruled that there was reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop, expressly declining to follow the Third Circuit’s (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Damien Marques McLendon, Jr. AKA - Damien M. McLendon, Jr. AKA Damien McLendon, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    Whether the Alleged Violation Constitutes a in making the assertion that merely touching the fog line constitutes a de minimis violation for which one cannot justifiably be subjected to a traffic stop.
  • State v. McLendon 185 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    Whether the Alleged Violation Constitutes a (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Allen Snelling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    In support of his argument that the stop was a pretext for looking for drugs, (La.App.
  • State v. Snelling 36 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    In support of his argument that the stop was a pretext for looking for drugs, (La.App.
  • State v. Rector 997 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    th, 80 F.3d 215, 219 (7th Cir.1996) (vehicle crossed over fog line on shoulder of the lane); United States v. Quinones-Sandoval, 943 F.2d 771, 773 (7th Cir. 1991) (vehicle ran over left and right fog lines while passing); United States v. Fiala, 929 F.2d 285, 286 (7th Cir.1991) (vehicle drifted roughly one-half its width over the right-hand fog line of a divided highway); (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Clayton W. Rector La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    r of the lane); United States v. Quinones-Sandoval, 943 F.2d 771, 773 (7th Cir.1991) (vehicle ran over left and right fog lines while passing); United States v. Fiala, 929 F.2d 285, 286 (7th Cir.1991) (vehicle drifted roughly one-half its width over the right-hand fog line of a divided highway); (La.App.
  • State v. Shivers 827 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    ith, 80 F.3d 215, 219 (7th Cir.1996) (vehicle crossed over fog line on shoulder of the lane); United States v. Quinones-Sandoval, 943 F.2d 771, 773 (7th Cir.1991) (vehicle ran over left and right fog lines while passing); United States v. Fiala, 929 F.2d 285, 286 (7th Cir.1991) (vehicle drifted roughly one-half its width over the right-hand fog line of a divided highway); (La.App.
  • State v. Waters 780 So. 2d 1053 La. 2001
    Smith, 80 F.3d 215, 219 (7th Cir.1996) (vehicle crossed over fog line on shoulder of the lane); United States v. Quinones-Sandoval, 943 F.2d 771, 773 (7th Cir.1991)(vehicle ran over left and right fog lines while passing); United States v. Fiala, 929 F.2d 285, 286 (7th Cir.1991)(vehicle drifted roughly one-half its width over the right-hand fog line of a divided highway); (La.App.
  • State v. Waters 751 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • Criticized State v. McVan 744 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    That being said, however, (La.App.
  • State v. Inzina 728 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Jackson 629 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    Furthermore, we stand convinced that the pattern of operation described here exceeded the "minor deviations" (La.App.
  • State v. Jackson 629 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    Furthermore, we stand convinced that the pattern of operation described here exceeded the “minor deviations” (La.App.
  • Distinguished Johnson v. State, Department of Public Safety & Corrections 610 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • State v. Shoemaker 569 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Williams 560 So. 2d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Elias 509 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Bradley 504 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Michiels 495 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Ruling of the Trial Court The trial judge said he believed the testimony of the state trooper, and that he *411 himself believed the officer had reasonable cause to stop the defendant, (La.App.
  • Distinguished City of Alexandria v. Webster 490 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Eppinette 478 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    in support of this position.
  • State v. Downer 460 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    4, 14, and one recent third-circuit case, (La.App.