Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Pitre, 893 So. 2d 1009.

22 citing documents.

State in the Interest of H.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
3 Cir. 2/9/05), State v. Hypolite, 04-1658 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Roman Ford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 2/9/05), State v. Beverly, 03-1348 (La.App.
State v. Ford 217 So. 3d 634 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 2/9/05) , ; State v. Beverly, 03-1348 (La.App.
State v. Armstead 159 So. 3d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
App. 3 Cir. 02/09/05); -1016 , and cases cited therein.
State of Louisiana v. Demarcus Fobb La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 2/9/05), State v. James, 99-1858 (La.App.
State v. Fobb 91 So. 3d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 2/9/05) , ; State v. James, 99-1858 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Brandon Dale Allen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/9/05), : Additionally, the court notes that the minutes of the habitual offender adjudication do not indicate the trial court vacated the originally imposed sentences of seven years on each count before imposing the habitual offender sentences.
State v. Allen 79 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/9/05), , 1012: Additionally, the court notes that the minutes of the habitual offender adjudication do not indicate the trial court vacated the originally imposed sentences of seven years on each count before imposing the habitual offender sentences.
State of Louisiana v. George Jameson Gray, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 2/9/05), (citing State v. Beverly, 03-1348 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Henry Bryan Lowe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 2/9/05), this court found that circumstantial evidence could be used to determine whether the victim was married to the defendant at the time the offenses of carnal knowledge occurred.
State v. Lowe 999 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 2/9/05) , , this court found that circumstantial evidence could be used to determine whether the victim was married to the defendant at the time the offenses of carnal knowledge occurred.
State in the Interest of J. L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 2/9/05), State v. Hypolite, 04-1658 (La.App.
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JENNIFER RENEE ROBERSON A/K/A JENNIFER ROBERTSON A/K/A JENNIFER THOMAS La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Roberson 956 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Stanford Dewayne Staton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 2/9/05), (citations omitted), the court held that “the failure to so advise the Defendant is harmless because a hearing was held, at which the Defendant was adjudicated a third habitual offender.
State v. Staton 922 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 2/9/05), (citations omitted), the court held that "the failure to so advise the Defendant is harmless because a hearing was held, at which the Defendant was adjudicated a third habitual offender.
State of Louisiana v. Paul Junius Felix La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Felix 918 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Marlon Alexander La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 2/9/05), this court stated: [T]he failure to so advise the Defendant is harmless because a hearing was held, at which the Defendant was adjudicated a .
State v. Alexander 916 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 2/9/05), , this court stated: [T]he failure to so advise the Defendant is harmless because a hearing was held, at which the Defendant was adjudicated a ...
State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Hypolite La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 2/9/05), State v. James, 99-1858 (La.App.
State v. Hypolite 903 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 2/9/05) , ; State v. James, 99-1858 (La.App.