Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. McGinnis, 981 So. 2d 881.

30 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Reuben S. Williamson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    3 Cir. 4/30/08), (quoting State v. Ellis, 42,520 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Deontay Deshun Hardy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    3 Cir. 4/30/08), (quoting State v. Ellis, 42,520, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Lance S. Barton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    3 Cir. 4/30/08), this Court held that where a defendant objected to the introduction of evidence on a ground other than the ground asserted on appeal, he was precluded from raising said objection on appeal.
  • State of Louisiana v. Gerald Samuel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
    3 Cir. 4/30/08), this court held that where a defendant objected to the introduction of evidence on a ground other than the ground asserted on appeal, he was precluded from raising said objection on appeal.
  • State of Louisiana v. Alfred Leonce Arceneaux AKA - Alfred L. Arceneaux AKA - Alfred Arceneaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State of Louisiana v. Glyndale Arceneaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 4/30/08), (quoting State v. Ellis, 42,520 (La.App.
  • State v. Arceneaux 164 So. 3d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 4/30/08), (quoting State v. Ellis, 42,520 (La.App.
  • State v. Simms 143 So. 3d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 4/30/08) , ; State v. Price, 04-812 (La.App.
  • State v. Keys 125 So. 3d 19 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 4/30/08), , where the court considered that evidence of the defendant’s prior conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine probative in finding that the State’s evidence was sufficient to meet the required elements of the same subsequent offense; State v. Ceaser, 09-236, pp. 16-17 (La.App.
  • State v. Cooper 120 So. 3d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 4/30/08) , ; State v. Price, 04-812 (La.App.
  • State v. Burton 116 So. 3d 863 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 4/30/08) , and State v. Price, 04-812 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ronald G. Acker, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 4/30/08), -89, stating in pertinent part: The trial court did not specify what portion, if any, of the Defendant‟s habitual offender fifty-year hard labor sentence, imposed for the conviction of armed robbery with use of a firearm, included the enhanced penalty of La.R.S.
  • State v. Acker 111 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    App. 3 Cir. 4/30/08), -89 , stating in pertinent part: The trial court did not specify what portion, if any, of the Defendant’s habitual offender fifty-year hard labor sentence, imposed for the conviction of armed robbery with use of a firearm, included the enhanced penalty of La.R.S.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth G. Billingsley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 4/30/08), the defendant was charged with armed robbery with a firearm, violations of La.R.S.
  • State v. Billingsley 86 So. 3d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 4/30/08) , , the defendant was charged with armed robbery with a firearm, violations of La.R.S.
  • State v. Scie 83 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 4/30/08) , ; State v. King, 06-1903 (La.10/16/07), , and State v. White, 42,725 (La.App.
  • State v. Kennedy 73 So. 3d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 4/30/08), ; State v. Price, 04-812 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Marcus Coleman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Burton 43 So. 3d 1073 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 4/30/08), ; State v. Price, 04-812 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Eric L. Hunter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Hunter 41 So. 3d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrell Stipe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 4/30/08), explaining: The trial court did not specify what portion, if any, of the Defendant’s habitual offender fifty-year hard labor sentence, imposed for the conviction of armed robbery with use of a firearm, included the enhanced penalty of La.R.S.
  • State v. Stipe 30 So. 3d 287 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 4/30/08) , , explaining: The trial court did not specify what portion, if any, of the Defendant's habitual offender fifty-year hard labor sentence, imposed for the conviction of armed robbery with use of a firearm, included the enhanced penalty of La.R.S.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ricky Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Austin Blake Ceaser La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 4/30/08), this court found sufficient evidence to support a finding that the defendant possessed cocaine with intent to distribute: The Defendant herein admitted that the 30.7 grams of cocaine in his car belonged to him and that he sold drugs.
  • State v. Ceaser 21 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 4/30/08), , this court found sufficient evidence to support a finding that the defendant possessed cocaine with intent to distribute: The Defendant herein admitted that the 30.7 grams of cocaine in his car belonged to him and that he sold drugs.
  • State of Louisiana v. Edward Charles Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 4/30/08), (quoting State v. Ellis, 42, 520, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
  • State v. Eason 3 So. 3d 685 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Platt 998 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Damon Lee Harmon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 4/30/08), -89, explaining, in pertinent part: The trial court did not specify what portion, if any, of the Defendant’s habitual offender fifty-year hard labor sentence, imposed for the conviction of armed robbery with use of a firearm, included the enhanced penalty of La.R.S.