Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. McGinnis, 981 So. 2d 881.
-
State of Louisiana v. Reuben S. Williamson
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
3 Cir. 4/30/08), (quoting State v. Ellis, 42,520 (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Deontay Deshun Hardy
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
3 Cir. 4/30/08), (quoting State v. Ellis, 42,520, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Lance S. Barton
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
3 Cir. 4/30/08), this Court held that where a defendant objected to the introduction of evidence on a ground other than the ground asserted on appeal, he was precluded from raising said objection on appeal.
-
State of Louisiana v. Gerald Samuel
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3 Cir. 4/30/08), this court held that where a defendant objected to the introduction of evidence on a ground other than the ground asserted on appeal, he was precluded from raising said objection on appeal.
- State of Louisiana v. Alfred Leonce Arceneaux AKA - Alfred L. Arceneaux AKA - Alfred Arceneaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
-
State of Louisiana v. Glyndale Arceneaux
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 4/30/08), (quoting State v. Ellis, 42,520 (La.App.
-
State v. Arceneaux
164 So. 3d 425
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 4/30/08), (quoting State v. Ellis, 42,520 (La.App.
-
State v. Simms
143 So. 3d 1258
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 4/30/08) , ; State v. Price, 04-812 (La.App.
-
State v. Keys
125 So. 3d 19
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 4/30/08), , where the court considered that evidence of the defendant’s prior conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine probative in finding that the State’s evidence was sufficient to meet the required elements of the same subsequent offense; State v. Ceaser, 09-236, pp. 16-17 (La.App.
-
State v. Cooper
120 So. 3d 844
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 4/30/08) , ; State v. Price, 04-812 (La.App.
-
State v. Burton
116 So. 3d 863
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 4/30/08) , and State v. Price, 04-812 (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Ronald G. Acker, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 4/30/08), -89, stating in pertinent part: The trial court did not specify what portion, if any, of the Defendant‟s habitual offender fifty-year hard labor sentence, imposed for the conviction of armed robbery with use of a firearm, included the enhanced penalty of La.R.S.
-
State v. Acker
111 So. 3d 535
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
App. 3 Cir. 4/30/08), -89 , stating in pertinent part: The trial court did not specify what portion, if any, of the Defendant’s habitual offender fifty-year hard labor sentence, imposed for the conviction of armed robbery with use of a firearm, included the enhanced penalty of La.R.S.
-
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth G. Billingsley
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 4/30/08), the defendant was charged with armed robbery with a firearm, violations of La.R.S.
-
State v. Billingsley
86 So. 3d 872
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 4/30/08) , , the defendant was charged with armed robbery with a firearm, violations of La.R.S.
-
State v. Scie
83 So. 3d 1082
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 4/30/08) , ; State v. King, 06-1903 (La.10/16/07), , and State v. White, 42,725 (La.App.
-
State v. Kennedy
73 So. 3d 985
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 4/30/08), ; State v. Price, 04-812 (La.App.
- State of Louisiana v. Marcus Coleman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
-
State v. Burton
43 So. 3d 1073
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 4/30/08), ; State v. Price, 04-812 (La.App.
- State of Louisiana v. Eric L. Hunter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- State v. Hunter 41 So. 3d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
-
State of Louisiana v. Terrell Stipe
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 4/30/08), explaining: The trial court did not specify what portion, if any, of the Defendant’s habitual offender fifty-year hard labor sentence, imposed for the conviction of armed robbery with use of a firearm, included the enhanced penalty of La.R.S.
-
State v. Stipe
30 So. 3d 287
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 4/30/08) , , explaining: The trial court did not specify what portion, if any, of the Defendant's habitual offender fifty-year hard labor sentence, imposed for the conviction of armed robbery with use of a firearm, included the enhanced penalty of La.R.S.
- State of Louisiana v. Ricky Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
-
State of Louisiana v. Austin Blake Ceaser
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 4/30/08), this court found sufficient evidence to support a finding that the defendant possessed cocaine with intent to distribute: The Defendant herein admitted that the 30.7 grams of cocaine in his car belonged to him and that he sold drugs.
-
State v. Ceaser
21 So. 3d 1122
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 4/30/08), , this court found sufficient evidence to support a finding that the defendant possessed cocaine with intent to distribute: The Defendant herein admitted that the 30.7 grams of cocaine in his car belonged to him and that he sold drugs.
-
State of Louisiana v. Edward Charles Jackson
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 4/30/08), (quoting State v. Ellis, 42, 520, pp. 4-5 (La.App.
- State v. Eason 3 So. 3d 685 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
- State v. Platt 998 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
-
State of Louisiana v. Damon Lee Harmon
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 4/30/08), -89, explaining, in pertinent part: The trial court did not specify what portion, if any, of the Defendant’s habitual offender fifty-year hard labor sentence, imposed for the conviction of armed robbery with use of a firearm, included the enhanced penalty of La.R.S.