DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bienemy, 483 So. 2d 1105.

152 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Carey Vallier, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. M. L. Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. ML JR. 35 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. CASSIMERE 34 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
  • State v. Stallworth 11 So. 3d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    If an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy, it does not establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Stubbs 999 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Major 1 So. 3d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Crowell , 99-2238, at p. 8, 773 So.2d at 878 ( (La.App.
  • State v. FBA 983 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. F.B.A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. F.B.A. 983 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    App. 4 Cir. 6/16/99), , (La.App.
  • State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Galindo 968 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Crowell , 99-2238, at p. 8, 773 So.2d at 878 ( (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Joseph Jody" Duplichan, Jr. " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    When reviewing matters of trial strategy, this court has noted: This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Duplichan 945 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Jackson 947 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Reichard 935 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Crowell , 99-2238, at p. 8, 773 So.2d at 878 ( (La.App.
  • State ex rel. D.A.G. 935 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • State v. Collins 896 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Dwayne Collins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Myers 888 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    This Court has also recognized that if the trial counsel’s actions fall “within the ambit of trial strategy”, they do not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Newman 879 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    This Court l^has also recognized that if the trial counsel’s actions fall “within the ambit of trial strategy”, they do not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Vance 879 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    *868 This court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Lewis 876 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
  • State of Louisiana v. Cedric Lynn Sias La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Sias 861 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Lagarde 861 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    As we have recognized: [I]f an alleged error falls "within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not "establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Matthews 859 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
    If an alleged error falls "within the ambit of trial strategy" it does not "establish ineffective assistance of counsel" (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 850 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    This court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of *786 trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Schexnaider 852 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Griffin 838 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Woods 830 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    This court has previously recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” State v. Bordes, 98-0086, p. 8, 738 So.2d at 147 , (La.App.
  • State v. Foster 828 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    This court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Harris 815 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Bordes , 98-0086 at p. 8, 738 So.2d at 147 , (La.App.
  • State v. George 829 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Francis 809 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Wilson 803 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Broyard 802 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 6/16/99), , *852 quoting State v.. Bienemy, (La.App.
  • State v. Lewis 800 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Homes 799 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    This court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Marino 804 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Holmes 791 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Collins 787 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Jason 787 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 6/16/99) , , (La.App.
  • State v. Rodriguez 786 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Williams 782 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Brauner 782 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Harrison 782 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    4 Cir. 6/16/99), , ( (La.App.
  • State v. Lacy 782 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    *50 This court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Davis 781 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001