DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bienemy, 483 So. 2d 1105.

152 citing documents.

  • State v. Carter 779 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Leban 777 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    This court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Jason 779 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Myers 773 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Crowell 773 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Walker 775 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 6/16/99), ( (La.App.
  • State v. Weaver 770 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Marshall 774 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 6/16/99), , (La.App.
  • State v. James 788 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Jones 769 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 6/16/99), , (La.App.
  • State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    4 Cir. 6/16/99), ( (La.App.
  • State v. Johnson 766 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
    If an alleged error falls "within the ambit of trial strategy" it does not "establish ineffective assistance of counsel" (La.App.
  • State v. Johnson 764 So. 2d 1113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Watson 763 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Griffin 756 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    This court has previously recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” Bordes, supra, at 147 , (La.App.
  • State v. McGee 757 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Biagas 754 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Davis 751 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Jenkins 750 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Green 750 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Thomas 750 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    If an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy,” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Meyers 748 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Talley 748 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    If an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Lambert 749 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    4 Cir. 6/16/99), ( (La.App.
  • State v. Bordes 738 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Raby 738 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Burns 723 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Green 731 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
  • State v. Johnson 718 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    This court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Chess 713 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Addison 684 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Cockerham 671 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Holmes 670 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • State v. Carr 665 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • State v. Johnson 652 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Smith 647 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Spears 647 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Wise 644 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    State v. Martin, 624 So.2d at 450 , (La.
  • State v. Green 632 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Comeaux 631 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    A reasonable probability is one sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” (La.App.
  • State v. Martin 624 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Gales 622 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Hunter 614 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Bouie 598 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Kelly 595 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    1903 , 77 L.Ed.2d 290 (1983); (La.App.
  • State v. Forest 590 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Hunter 563 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Sterling 558 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. James 555 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Johnson 551 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989