Cited by

9/28/18), deciding whether to apply the doctrine, courts consider whether: (1) the party against whom judicial estoppel is sought has asserted a legal position that is plainly inconsistent with a prior position; (2) a court accepted the prior position; and (3) the party did not act inadvertently.

9/ 28/ 18), ( recognizing that, where a subsequent appeal involves the same background, issues, and assignments of error that this court has already thoroughly discussed, we are bound by the " law of the circuit doctrine" to follow the prior opinion.)

9/ 28/ 18), recognizing this court is bound by the " law of the circuit doctrine" to follow prior decisions); see also Internal Rules of Court, First Circuit Court of Appeal, Rule 2.

9/ 28/ 18), ( recognizing this court is bound by the " law of the circuit" doctrine to follow prior decisions); see also Internal Rules of Court, First Circuit Court of Appeal, Rule 2.

9/ 28/ 18), ( recognizing that, where a subsequent appeal involves the same background, issues, and assignments of error that have already been thoroughly discussed by this court, we are bound by the " law of the circuit doctrine" to follow the prior opinion.)

9/ 28/ 18), ( recognizing this court is bound by the " law of the circuit" doctrine to follow its prior decisions.)