Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Hand, 770 So. 2d 762.

29 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Harrison Buckner Doyle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. in the Interest of K.S. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana in the Interest of M.H. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Pineville City Court, Et Al. v. City Of Pineville, Et Al. La. 2023
10/17/00), (citing 12 Ultimately, we find City Court has failed to show that its petition for mandamus was an appropriate vehicle for its action.
State v. Broussard 268 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/17/00), , 765-66 n.9 ( citing Vallo, 646 So.2d at 864 ).
State v. Grant 198 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Vallo , 94-1238, p. 7, 646 So.2d at 864; See also State v. Schoening, 00-0903 (La.10/17/00), .
State ex rel. Arnaud v. State 188 So. 3d 1004 La. 2016
State v. Schoening, 00-0903, p. 3 (La.10(17/00), (citing Valla v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238, p, 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 ).
State v. Tillery 167 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
10 State v. Hatton, 07-2377 (La.7/1/08); -20 (citing State v. Schoening, 00-0903 (La.10/17/00); (citing Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94); -65 )).
State v. Jackson 154 So. 3d 722 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Schoening, 00-0903, p. 3 (La.10/17/00), (citing Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), ).
State of Louisiana v. Carl J. Webb, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Webb 149 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
13:4448; State v. Schoening, [00-903] (La.10/17/00), -766 .
State ex rel. C.M. 128 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Schoening, 00-0903, p. 3 (La.10/17/00), (citing Vallo , 94-1238 at 8, 646 So.2d at 865 ).
State v. Hankton 122 So. 3d 1028 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
[ 1fiLike the district court in State v. Schoening, 00-0903 (La.10/17/00), , where the Supreme Court vacated a judgment declaring La.
State v. Bazile 144 So. 3d 719 La. 2013
Id., 2011-2201, p. 7; 85 So.3d at 5 ; see State v. Schoening, 2000-0903, p. 3 (La.10/17/00); , quoting Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 1994-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94); -865 (“This court has stated that, while there is no single required procedure or type of proceeding for attacking a statute’s constitutionality, ‘the long-standing jurisprudential rule of law is ...
State v. Overstreet 111 So. 3d 308 La. 2013
State v. Schoening, 00-0903, p. 3 (La.10/17/00), (citing Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 ).
State v. Duheart 125 So. 3d 1054 La. 2012
See State v. Schoening, 00-0903, p. 3 (La.10/17/00), , quoting Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 (“This court has stated that, while there is no single required procedure or type of proceeding for attacking a statute’s constitutionality, ‘the long-standing jurisprudential rule of law is ...
State of Louisiana v. v. L. G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Schoening, 00-0903, p. 3 (La.10/17/00), (citing Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94- 1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65).
State v. Whitmore 58 So. 3d 583 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
See State v. Hatton, 07-2377 (La.07/01/08), ; State v. Schoening, 00-0903 (La.10/17/00), ; Williams v. State Dept. of Health and Hospitals, 95-0713 (La.01/26/96), .
State v. Watts 41 So. 3d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Schoening, 00-0903, p. 3 (La.10/17/00), .
In the Matter of State Ex Rel. Lw 40 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Schoening, XXXX-XXXX, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), -66 ("[T]he attorney general should be served a copy of the pleading which contests the constitutionality of a statute, so that he may choose whether or not to exercise his right to represent the state's interest in the proceedings."
State ex rel. L.W. 40 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
10/17/00), -66 (''[T]he attorney general should be served a copy of the pleading which contests the constitutionality of a statute, so that he may choose whether or not to exercise his right to represent the state’s interest in the proceedings.” (Internal quotation omitted, footnote omitted.)).
State v. Smith 20 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
13:4448; State v. Schoening, 00-903, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), -66 (“[T]he attorney general should be served a copy of the pleading which contests the constitutionality of a statute, so that he may choose whether or not to exercise his right to represent the state’s interest in the proceedings.” (Internal quotation omitted, footnote omitted.)).
State v. Burnes 997 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Schoening, 00-0903, p. 3 (La.10/17/00), (citing Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238, p. 8 (La.11/30/94), -65 ).
State v. Hatton 985 So. 2d 709 La. 2008
State v. Schoening, *719 00-0903, p. 3 (La.10/17/00), (citing Blanchard v. State, through Parks and Recreation Com'n.
State v. Hines 970 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Schoening, 00-903 (La.10/17/00), -66 .
State of Louisiana v. Clayton James Greene La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
10/17/00), the supreme court discussed constitutional challenges as follows: Legislative enactments are presumed valid and their constitutionality should be upheld whenever possible.
State v. Spears 940 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
13:4448; State v. Citizen, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/1/05), ; State v. Schoening, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/17/00), ; State v. Shumaker, 40,275 (La.App.
DENHAM SPRINGS v. All Taxpayers 894 So. 2d 325 La. 2005
See Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., 94-1238 (La.11/30/94), , 865 and State v. Schoening, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/17/00), .
In Re Hand 787 So. 2d 294 La. 2001
In re Hand, 00-2591 (La.9/13/00), .