Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State ex rel. M.N.H., 807 So. 2d 1149.

17 citing documents.

State of Louisiana in the Interest of R.R. B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
3 Cir. 2/6/02), writ denied, 02–1041 (La.5/24/02)
State ex rel. C.L. 184 So. 3d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 2/6/02) , , writ denied, 02-1041 (La.5/24/02), .
State in the Interest of S. D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 2/6/02), writ denied, 02-1041 (La.
State ex rel. S.D. 149 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 2/6/02) , , writ denied, 02-1041 (La.5/24/02), .
State in the Interest of C. C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 2/6/02), -55, writ denied, 02- 1041 (La.5/24/02), stated: When an excessive disposition is complained of in a juvenile proceeding, the record must be reviewed to determine whether the juvenile court imposed the least restrictive disposition c
State ex rel. C.C. 124 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir. 2/6/02), -55 , writ denied, 02-1041 (La.5/24/02), , stated: When an excessive disposition is complained of in a juvenile proceeding, the record must be reviewed to determine whether the juvenile court imposed the least restrictive disposition consistent with the circumstances of the case, the child’s needs
State in the Interest of K.E.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/6/02), writ 3 denied, 02-1041 (La.
State ex rel. K.E.C. 54 So. 3d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 2/6/02) , , writ denied, 02-1041 (La.5/24/02), (holding that the failure to timely conduct a disposition hearing is an error patent).
State Ex Rel. Kec 54 So. 3d 735 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
App. 3 Cir. 2/6/02), , writ denied, 02-1041 (La.5/24/02), (holding that the failure to timely conduct a disposition hearing is an error patent).
State Ex Rel. Ab 25 So. 3d 1012 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/6/02), -55 , writ denied, 02-1041 (La.5/24/02), , stated: When an excessive disposition is complained of in a juvenile proceeding, the record must be reviewed to determine whether the juvenile court imposed the least restrictive disposition consistent with the circumstances of the case, the child's needs
State in the Interest of A.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/6/02), -55, writ denied, 02-1041 (La.
State ex rel. A.B. 25 So. 3d 1012 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
3 Cir. 2/6/02), -55 , writ denied, 02-1041 (La.5/24/02), , stated: When an excessive disposition is complained of in a juvenile proceeding, the record must be reviewed to determine whether the juvenile court imposed the least restrictive disposition consistent with the circumstances of the case, the child’s needs
State ex rel. A.M. 983 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 2/6/02), -56 , the Court found that a failure to conduct a disposition hearing within thirty days after adjudication because of a delay resulting from the juvenile’s objection to the predisposition report constituted good cause for the delay.
State Ex Rel. Am 983 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 2/6/02), -56 , the Court found that a failure to conduct a disposition hearing within thirty days after adjudication because of a delay resulting from the juvenile's objection to the predisposition report constituted good cause for the delay.
State of Louisiana v. Ivory L. Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 2/6/02), writ denied, 02-1041 (La.
State ex rel. D. M. 851 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 2/6/02) , ; State ex.
State v. Erven 830 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
3d Cir.2/6/02), , writ denied, 02-1041 (La.5/24/02), .