Decker v. Renaudin
Also decided on this docket: La., April 15, 1891 43 La. Ann. 476
Decker v. Renaudin, 122 So. 600 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929).
Cited by
- Garlete v. Rodriguez 126 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
- Doll v. Cuccia 76 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
- Mathews v. 8 Mile Post Plumbing Supplies, Inc. 70 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
- Savich v. Ruiz 32 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
- Schroeder v. Morris 20 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
- Stephen L. Guice Co. v. Perkowski 12 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
- Anderson v. Blache 134 So. 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
- Eastbank Land Co. Inc. v. Hoffstetter 128 So. 527 La. 1930
- East Bank Land Co. v. Hoffstetter 125 So. 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
- Luderbach v. Cristina & Lauricella, Inc. 125 So. 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Opinion text
ON REHEARING JANVIER, J. On application for rehearing, plaintiff and appellant calls attention to our failure to render judgment against the co-defendant, E. Palmer Smith. This omission was due to the fact that in the original petition, judgment was asked against only one defendant, Miss Renaudin. The decree and judgment should have been against both defendants, and it is now, therefore, ordered that the rehearing applied for by plaintiff and appellant be and it is refused and that the decree heretofore rendered by us be amended so as to read as follows: It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from be annulled, avoided and reversed and that plaintiff, Emile J. Decker, do now have and recover judgment against. Miss Ruth F. Renaudin, and E. Palmer Smith, jointly, severally and in solido, in the sum of Six Hundred and Ninty-Four Dollars ($694.00), with legal interest from December 13, 1925, until paid. All costs to be paid by defendants.