Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Taylor, 97 So. 3d 522.
-
State of Louisiana v. Demon'tay Deon Dunbar
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5 Cir. 6/28/12), –36, the fifth circuit explained: While the United States Supreme Court has emphasized the prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence, it has not specifically spoken on the timing of such disclosures.
- State of Louisiana Versus Cortez Joseph La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
- State of Louisiana Versus Carlos McKnight, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
- State of Louisiana Versus Rene Fuentes La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
-
State of Louisiana Versus Shineda N. Taylor
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
App. 5 Cir. 06/28/12), State v. Jacobs, 07-887 (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jamal Christopher Lacon
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5 Cir. 6/28/12), –36, the fifth circuit discussed alleged exculpatory evidence not disclosed as follows: In Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87, 83 S.Ct.
-
State of Louisiana v. Raven Lamar Wiltz
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
5 Cir. 6/28/12), –36, the fifth circuit discussed alleged exculpatory evidence not disclosed as follows: In Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87, 83 S.Ct.
-
State v. Richardson
265 So. 3d 1006
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 5 Cir. 6/28/12), , 529.
-
State v. Garcie
242 So. 3d 1279
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 5 Cir. 6/28/12), , 538 ; and State v. Brooks , 12-226, p. 19 (La.
-
State v. Wiley
216 So. 3d 393
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5 Cir. 6/28/12) , ; and State v. Brooks, 12-226 (La.App.
-
State v. Batiste
208 So. 3d 1028
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5 Cir. 6/28/12) , ; State v. Jacobs, 07-887 (La.App.
-
State v. Otkins-Victor
193 So. 3d 479
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
App. 5 Cir, 6/28/12), ; State v. Jacobs, 07-887 (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. William Shupp
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
5 Cir. 6/28/12), -36, the fifth circuit discussed alleged exculpatory evidence not disclosed as follows: In Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87, 83 S.Ct.
-
State v. Shupp
185 So. 3d 900
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5 Cir. 6/28/12) , -36 , the fifth circuit discussed alleged exculpatory evidence not disclosed as follows: In Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 , 83 S.Ct.
-
State v. Oliver
165 So. 3d 970
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 6/28/12) , ; State v. Jacobs, 07-887 (La.App.
-
State v. Gatlin
164 So. 3d 891
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 6/28/12) , ; State v. Jacobs, 07-887 (La.
-
State v. Gross
145 So. 3d 521
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 6/28/12) , ; State v. Jacobs, 07-887 (La.App.
-
State v. George
142 So. 3d 210
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
App. 5 Cir. 6/28/12), ; State v. Jacobs, 07-887 (La.App.
-
State v. Wilson
142 So. 3d 275
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 6/28/12) , ; State v. Jacobs, 07-887 (La.App.
-
State v. Bibbins
140 So. 3d 153
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 6/28/12) , ; State v. Jacobs, 07-887 (La.App.
-
State v. Williams
128 So. 3d 359
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 6/28/12) , ; and State v. Davenport, 08-463 (La.App.
-
State v. Williams
125 So. 3d 1195
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 6/28/12) , ; and State v. Davenport, 08-463 (La.App.
-
State v. Stevenson
121 So. 3d 792
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 6/28/12) , ; and State v. Davenport, 08-463 (La.App.
-
State v. Pham
119 So. 3d 202
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 6/28/12); ; and State v. Brooks, 12-226 (La.App.