Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ackerman, 26 So. 80.

13 citing documents.

State v. Pridgen 175 So. 63 La. 1937
Charity Hospital v. Axford 131 So. 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
State v. McCall 110 So. 723 La. 1926
State v. Lewis 105 So. 243 La. 1925
State v. Craig 104 So. 744 La. 1925
Distinguished State v. Cryar 104 So. 304 La. 1925
State v. Kilshaw 103 So. 740 La. 1925
State v. Bulloch 92 So. 127 La. 1922
State v. Thibodeaux 67 So. 973 La. 1915
State v. Breaux 47 So. 876 La. 1908
This court clearly says in Ackerman Case, , 26 South.
State v. Burkhalter 43 So. 268 La. 1907
§§ 1062, 1063; ; 26 South.
Compton v. Dietlein 42 So. 964 La. 1907
Beyond this, the evident purpose of the act of 1896 “was to check or suppress the practice of doing away with goods bought on credit in fraud of the vendor’s claim for the unpaid price.” , 26 South.
State v. Stover 35 So. 405 La. 1903