State v. Carr
State v. Carr, 35 So. 839 (La. 1904).
Cited by
- State v. Haddad 59 So. 2d 411 La. 1952
- State v. Honeycutt 49 So. 2d 610 La. 1950
- State v. Lecompte 36 So. 2d 695 La. 1947
- State v. Lebleu 14 So. 2d 17 La. 1943
- State v. Chretien 167 So. 426 La. 1936
- State v. Smith 106 So. 298 La. 1925
- State v. Kahn 98 So. 86 La. 1923
- State v. Smith 90 So. 28 La. 1921
- State v. Miller 70 So. 330 La. 1915
- State v. Bradley 66 So. 395 La. 1914
- State v. Evans 66 So. 259 La. 1914
- City of New Orleans v. Smythe 41 So. 33 La. 1906
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Haines 51 La. Ann. 731
- 30 La. Ann. 1170 not in our corpus
- 31 La. Ann. 804 not in our corpus
- State v. Comstock 36 La. Ann. 308
- State v. Wilson 109 La. 74
- 104 La. 166 not in our corpus
- State v. Hagan 45 La. Ann. 839
- State ex rel. Pettigrew v. Hall 109 La. 290
Opinion text
NICHOLLS, C. J. Defendant has appealed from a sentence of death pronounced against him under a conviction for murder. I-Ie applied unsuccessfully in the lower court for a new trial, assigning as a ground that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence, and that two of the jurors were guilty of misconduct *717 There was some testimony taken on this latter point upon the hearing of the application, and a note made of several objections urged. We find this testimony and these objections in the transcript, but no bill of exceptions. The necessity for such a bill has been repeatedly announced. We cannot consider the objections so raised (State v. Haines, 51 La. Ann. 731 , 25 South. 372 , 44 L. R. A. 837; State v. Jessie, 30 La. Ann. 1170 ; State v. Dufour, 31 La. Ann. 804 ; State v. Comstock, 36 La. Ann. 308 ; State v. Wilson, 109 La. 74 , 33 South. 85 ; State v. Napoleon, 104 La. 166 , 28 South. 972 ), or the testimony so transcribed (State v. Hagan, 45 La. Ann. 839 , 12 South. 929 ; State ex rel. Pettigrew v. Hall, 109 La. 290 , 33 South. 318 ). Por the reasons assigned, we have no alternative but to affirm the judgment. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.