No. 21546 Precedential Affirmed. Processed

State v. Miller

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed November 15, 1915 · 70 So. 330

Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., February 6, 1961 127 So. 2d 250

Cited by

State v. Chretien 167 So. 426 La. 1936
State v. Mullins 116 So. 393 La. 1928
State v. Smith 106 So. 298 La. 1925
State v. Kahn 98 So. 86 La. 1923
State v. Miller 83 So. 539 La. 1919
State v. Hawthorn 72 So. 805 La. 1916
State v. Matassa 71 So. 190 La. 1916

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

City of New Orleans v. Ricker 137 La. 843
State v. Carr 111 La. 716
State v. Simmons 118 La. 22
State v. Bradley 136 La. 55
State v. Harkis 39 La. Ann. 228
State v. Calkins 48 La. Ann. 1283
State v. Artus 110 La. 441
State v. Haines 51 La. Ann. 731
State v. Evans 135 La. 891
State v. Poree 136 La. 939

Opinion text

SOMMERVILLE, J. Defendant was charged with murder; and convicted of manslaughtér. [1] Two unsigned bills of exceptions are found in the record; but they do not appear to have been filed, and therefore they should not have been copied in the transcript. They are not before the court for review. If, for any reason, the trial judge refused to sign the bills of exceptions, and defendant thought that he was entitled to have them signed, he should have applied to this court for a mandamus to compel the judge to sign them; and’the action of the trial judge would have been reviewed. [2-4] The record also contains the evidence of some 18 jurors, taken on their examinations on their voir dire, with a notation, in each instance, by the clerk, that counsel for defendant excepts to the ruling of the court and reserves a bill; but no bill was prepared in any one instance, or presented to the district attorney and then to the court for signature, and no one bill has been filed. “On appeal in a criminal case, evidence found in the transcript, but not coming up as part of a bill of exception, will not be noticed.’’ City of New Orleans v. Ricker & Beck, 137 La. 843 , 69 South. 273 . “A notation by the clerk of court in a criminal case that the defendant excepted and reserved a bill cannot be considered a bill of exceptions.” State v. Carr, 111 La. 716 , 35 South. 839 , and authorities there cited; State v. Simmons, 118 La. 22 , 42 South. 582 ; State v. Bradley, 136 La. 55 , 66 South. 395 . “Unsigned bills copied in the transcript are in legal contemplation no bills at all.” State v. Harris, 39 La. Ann. 228 , 1 South. 446 ; State v. Calkins, 48 La. Ann. 1283 , 20 South. 720 ; State v. Artus, 110 La. 441 , 34 South. 596 . “To amount to a bill of exceptions, it must be drawn, and it must be signed by the judge.” State v. Haines, 51 La. Ann. 731 , 25 South. 372 , 44 L. R. A. 837; State v. Evans, 135 La. 891 , 66 South. 259 ; State v. Poree, 136 La. 939 , 68 South. 83 . ‘.‘The necessity for a bill of exceptions has *375 been repeatedly announced.” State v. Carr, 111 La. 716 , 35 South. 839 . As the record does not contain a bill of exceptions or assignment of errors, there is nothing before the court to be reviewed. Defendant has filed no brief. Judgment affirmed.