No. 16,233 Precedential Affirmed. Processed

State v. Simmons

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed November 26, 1906 · 42 So. 582

Cited by

State v. Brown 180 So. 2d 410 La. 1965
State v. Thomas 135 So. 2d 275 La. 1961
State v. Gaines 66 So. 2d 618 La. 1953
State v. Haddad 59 So. 2d 411 La. 1952
State v. Honeycutt 49 So. 2d 610 La. 1950
State v. Lecompte 36 So. 2d 695 La. 1947
State v. Lebleu 14 So. 2d 17 La. 1943
State v. Carlson 188 So. 155 La. 1939
State v. Chretien 167 So. 426 La. 1936
State v. Smith 106 So. 298 La. 1925
State v. Miller 70 So. 330 La. 1915

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

36 La. Ann. 309 not in our corpus
State v. Haines 51 La. Ann. 731
104 La. 166 not in our corpus
State ex rel. Markham v. Read 52 La. Ann. 271

Opinion text

NICHOLLS, J. The defendant has appealed from the judgment of the district court sentencing him to pay a fine of $325, *23 and in default thereof 30 days in the parish jail. We find in the transcript what purports to he' all the testimony as adduced on the trial. It was not annexed to and made part of a bill of exceptions, and we cannot consider it. No bill of exceptions appears to have been taken. The note found in the body of the testimony given on the trial by the defendant and by witness Baxter, to the effect that certain questions propounded to these witnesses were objected to by the state, that the objection was sustained, and the bill of exception was reserved, is not a bill of exceptions. State v. Comstock, 36 La. Ann. 309 ; State v. Haines, 51 La. Ann. 731 , 25 South. 372 , 44 L. R. A. 837; State v. Napoleon, 104 La. 166 , 28 South. 972 ; State ex rel. Markham v. Read, 52 La. Ann. 271 , 26 South. 826 . Binding no ground for the reversal of the judgment appealed from, it is hereby affirmed.