DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reimann Const. Co. v. Upton, 178 So. 528.

23 citing documents.

  • Price v. Huey Childs Builder, Inc. 426 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    579 (Orl.La.App.1940); (Orl.
  • RO Roy & Company, Inc. v. a & W TRAILER SALES 277 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
    Orl.1945); Reimann Const. Co.
  • Prince v. Paretti Pontiac Co. 262 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    Orleans, 1945, ; Reimann Construction Company v. Upton, La.App.Orleans, 1938, .
  • Baker v. KELLER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION 219 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
  • U-Finish Homes, Inc. v. Lanzl 202 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    516 ; Reimann Const. Co. v. Upton, La.App., and Merrill v. Marang [Harang], La.App., 198 So.
  • Breaux v. Co-Operative Cold Storage Builders, Inc. 187 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    125 (1926) ; Lillis v. Anderson, 21 So.
  • Airco Refrigeration Service, Inc. v. Fink 134 So. 2d 880 La. 1961
    202 ; Reimann Const. Co. v. Upton, La.App., ; Davidson v. McGrath, 5 La.
  • Justiss-Mears Oil Company v. Pennington 132 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    202 ; Reimann Construction Co., Inc. v. Upton, La.App., ; Jack v. Henry, La.App., .
  • Papa v. Louisiana Metal Awning Company 131 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
  • Jack v. Henry 128 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Ann. 202 ; Reimann Construction Company v. Upton, La.App., ; Merrill v. Harang, La.App., 198 So.
  • Ducore v. Gross 110 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1959
    App., ; Merrill v. Harang, La.App., 198 So.
  • Jones v. Tusa 100 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    386 ; Reimann Const. Co. v. Upton, La.App., ; Peterson v. Peralta, 3 La.App.
  • Baker v. Stamps 82 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    386 ; Reimann Const. Co. v. Upton, La.App., .” In Lillis v. Anderson, LaApp., , appears the following: “While it is the general rule that a person suing to recover on a commutative contract must allege and prove that he has fully performed his part of the engagement in order to recover, it is the well-settled jurisprudence of this state that t
  • Spicuzza v. Ranzino 73 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    516 ; Reimann Const. Co. v. Upton, La.App., ; Merrill v. Harang, La.App., 198 So.
  • D'Avy v. Briley 72 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    125 ; Reimann Const. Co. v. Upton, La.App.1938, ; Lillis v. Anderson, La.App.1945, ; A. M. Blodgett Const. Co. v. Cheney Lumber Co., 1912, 129 La.
  • Banks v. Reed 52 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    The Orleans Court of Appeal discussed the applicable principle of law from .the contractor’s viewpoint in the case of Reimann Construction Co., Inc. v. Upton, La.App., .
  • Walter E. Canulette Son v. Clesi 39 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., ; Merrill v. Harang, La.
  • Brandin Slate Co. v. Bannister 30 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., , we said: "Our brother below visited the premises and was of the opinion that there are defects in workmanship apparent to the naked eye which should be remedied.
  • Sarver v. Barksdale 24 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
  • Mangin v. Jorgens 24 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    App., ; Merrill v. Harang, La.
  • Lillis v. Anderson 21 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
    App., and Merrill v. Marang, La.
  • Merrill v. Harang 198 So. 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    125 ; Reimann Construction Co., Inc., v. Upton, La.App., .
  • Cary v. Brown 196 So. 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    The authorities on this point were reviewed by us at length in the matter of Reimann Construction Company, .