No. 17,135
Precedential
Dismissed.
Processed
Boudreaux v. Boudreaux
Boudreaux v. Boudreaux, 47 So. 758 (La. 1908).
Cited by
- Danna v. Yazoo M v. R. Co. 154 So. 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
- Klumpp v. Fontenot 122 So. 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
- Whitney Central Trust & Savings Bank v. Greenwood Planting & Mfg. Co. 83 So. 834 La. 1920
- Abraham v. Wallenberg 58 So. 895 La. 1912
- Girod v. Monroe Brick Co. 52 So. 550 La. 1910
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- 31 La. Ann. 858 not in our corpus
- Hudson v. Garrett 47 La. Ann. 1534
Opinion text
On- Motion to Dismiss. PROYOSTY, J. The transcript having been filed more than three days after the return day, and there being a motion to dismiss, the appeal must, be dismissed. Code Prac. art. 594; Laussade v. Maury, 31 La. Ann. 858 . The motion to dismiss was filed more than three days after the filing of the transcript; but a motion to dismiss, based on the tardy filing of the transcript, need not be filed within the three days following the filing of the transcript. Hudson v. Garrett, Sheriff, 47 La. Ann. 1534 , 18 South. 510 . Appeal dismissed.