Whitney Central Trust & Savings Bank v. Greenwood Planting & Mfg. Co.
Whitney Central Trust & Savings Bank v. Greenwood Planting & Mfg. Co., 83 So. 834 (La. 1920).
Cited by
- Calvert Fire Insurance v. Jones 93 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
- Port Barre Lumber Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Construction Co. 91 So. 2d 769 La. 1956
- Crosby v. Lone Star Cement Corp. 90 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
- Mississippi River Bridge Authority v. Norman 89 So. 2d 117 La. 1956
- Merchants & Manufacturers Bank v. Southern Engineering & Construction Co. 83 So. 2d 645 La. 1955
- Southern Premium Service v. Oddo 75 So. 2d 20 La. 1954
- W. T. Burton Co. v. Stevens & Co. 45 So. 2d 634 La. 1950
- Gazzo v. Bisso Ferry Co. 174 So. 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
- Mitcham v. Mitcham 165 So. 635 La. 1935
- Vinyard v. Stassi 152 So. 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
- Weber v. Kemp 148 So. 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
- Klumpp v. Fontenot 122 So. 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Untereiner v. Miller 29 La. Ann. 435
- 31 La. Ann. 858 not in our corpus
- Coudroy v. Pecot 51 La. Ann. 495
- 52 La. Ann. 1637 not in our corpus
- Boudreaux v. Boudreaux 122 La. 433
Opinion text
On Motion to Dismiss Appeal. MONROE, C. J. On April 6, 1916, defendant obtained an order herein for a devolutive appeal, returnable in this court on May 9, 1916, from an order of seizure and sale of *573 date April 14, 1915, and it lodged tlie transcript in tills court on June 1, 1916, or, say, on the twenty-third day after the return day, upon which ground, and another, the defendant now moves to dismiss the appeal. No application for an extension of time for filing the transcript having been presented to, or acted on by, this court, and the law fixing three days as the limit of time beyond the' return day within which a transcript can be filed, without such extension, the motion must prevail. C. P. arts. 589, 594; Untereiner v. Miller, 29 La. Ann. 435 ; Laussade v. Maury, 31 La. Ann. 858 ; Coudroy v. Pecot, 51 La. Ann. 495 , 25 South. 270 ; Le Blanc v. Lemaire, 52 La. Ann. 1637 , 28 South. 105 ; Boudreaux v. Boudreaux, 122 La. 433 , 47 South. 758 . The appeal is therefore dismissed, at the cost of the appellant.