Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Smith v. Huie-Hodge Lumber Co., 49 So. 655.

20 citing documents.

Evergreen Plantation, Inc. v. Zunamon 272 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
Wicker v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance 205 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
957 , (1909); Hotard v. Dupont, 1 La.App.
State ex rel. Poche v. Police Jury of St. James Parish 109 So. 2d 83 La. 1959
[957], 958, ; James v. St.
Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Callicott 83 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
957, 958 , ; James v. St.
Martin Timber Co. v. Jean Lumber Co. 80 So. 2d 855 La. 1955
ve been weighed, counted or measured.” And Article 1920 states that “The rule that the obligation to deliver a determinate object is perfect by the mere consent of the parties, * * * is without any exception as respects immovables, not only between the parties, but as to all the world * * Accordingly, the sale in this case was complete upon signing of the deed ( , 49 So.
Ranger Land Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 68 So. 2d 907 La. 1953
This conclusion was necessary for the decisions in the following cases: , 49 So.
Cox v. Gross 47 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
957 , ; Succession of Savoie, 195 La.
Clark v. Weaver Bros. Realty Corporation 200 So. 821 La. 1941
Act 188 of 1904; , 49 So.
Succession of Savoie 196 So. 923 La. 1940
[957], 958, ; James v. Hotel, 145 La.
Cooley v. Meridian Lumber Co. 197 So. 255 La. 1940
Mossler Acceptance Co. v. Moliere 181 So. 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Andrus v. Eunice Band Mill Co. 169 So. 449 La. 1936
“Contracts for the sale of standing timber, with varying stipulations as to price and as to the time in which the timber should be removed, have more than once been held by this court to be sales.” , 49 So.
Depetro v. Mitchner 134 So. 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
958 , ; James v. Hotel, 145 La.
Vivian State Bank v. Holcomb 127 So. 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
957 , ; Hotard vs. Dupont, 1 La.
River & Rails Terminals, Inc. v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co. 103 So. 331 La. 1925
958 , ; James v. Hotel, 145 La.
Simmons v. Tremont Lumber Co. 81 So. 263 La. 1919
Gray v. Edgar Lumber Co. 70 So. 877 La. 1916
Act 188 of 1904; [ 49 South.
Smith v. Huie-Hodge Lumber Co. 55 So. 698 La. 1911
PROVOSTY, J. This suit came to this court on exception of no cause of action, and is reported in , 49 South.
Morgan v. O'Bannon & Julien 51 So. 293 La. 1910
We find not the least difficulty in arriving at the conclusion that under the legislative act interpreted in several decisions, , 49 South.
Hyde v. Barron 51 So. 126 La. 1909