Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McDuffie v. Walker, 51 So. 100.

202 citing documents.

Moore v. Shell Oil Company 228 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
Texaco, Inc. v. H. O. Roy, Inc. 229 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Roy, Inc., agrees that whether the restriction is classified as a continuous nonapparent servitude, a real obligation running with the land, or a covenant running with the land, to affect third parties it must be properly recorded and must comply with the requirements of the “public records doctrine” , 51 So.
Pilcher v. Paulk 228 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
ason why the sale from plaintiff's ex-wife to Menefee is valid is that while Menefee knew that there was a divorce proceeding in Jefferson County, Texas, and that the wife had stated in her Texas petition that there was not any community property between the parties since there was nothing of record in Sabine Parish, Louisiana, plaintiff was a , 51 So.
American Creosote Co. v. Springer 232 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1969
Gulf Oil Corp. v. Adams 209 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Appellees urge the correctness of the lower court’s , 51 So.
Davis-Wood Lumber Company v. DeBrueys 200 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
The defendants allege that a reinstatement of the lien would cause undue violence to the "public records doctrine" , 51 So.
Loeb v. Badalamenti 192 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Anderson v. Courtney 190 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
*495 LSA-RCC Article 2264 , 51 So.
LeBoeuf v. Malbrough 188 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
*200 In ruling inadmissible the parol evidence tendered by defendant, , 51 So.
Southwest Gas Producing Co. v. Creslenn Oil Co. 181 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
It is the contention of THE BANK that, under the law of registry as provided by Article 2264, , 51 So.
Bolding v. Eason Oil Company 178 So. 2d 246 La. 1965
Quinette v. Delhommer 176 So. 2d 399 La. 1965
152, and Chachere v. Superior Oil Company, 192 La.
Quinette v. Delhommer 176 So. 2d 399 La. 1965
It relies upon the statutes [9] and the decisions applying the public records doctrine, , 51 So.
Huff v. Justice 174 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
There is no doubt, , 51 So.
Kinney v. Waddell 171 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
ment of possession 'in the Conveyance Records of Jefferson Davis Parish, Louisiana, , 51 So.
Industrial Outdoor Displays v. Reuter 162 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
Hasslocher v. Recknagel 160 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
Wilkinson v. McGowen 160 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
In support of his contention as to the application of the codal article, , 51 So.
Succession of Rosinski 158 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Knapp 156 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
ARKANSAS FUEL OIL CORPORATION v. Weber 149 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
Unquestionably, the defendant, Weber, is the lessee in good faith of the properties involved in Tracts 3 and 5, who purchased on the faith of the public records, and is, therefore, , 51 So.
Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company v. Woodcock 150 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
The trial judge, , 51 So.
Burt v. Valois 144 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
In this latter regard appellant relies upon that line of authorities established, inter alia, , 51 So.
Speights v. Nance 142 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
The court stated the rule to be: “ , 51 So.
Distinguished Doucet v. Landry 140 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Newman v. McClure 134 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Shapiro v. Bryan 132 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
White v. Lockhart 129 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Prevot v. Courtney 129 So. 2d 1 La. 1961
Any other holding would be directly contrary to the well settled jurisprudence of this court, , 51 So.
Clark v. Reed 122 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
Ewald v. Hodges 120 So. 2d 465 La. 1960
The landmark case in our state is McDuffie Vs. Walker, , 51 So.
Allen v. George 110 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
which provided that: To the contract of lease, as to that of sale, three things are absolutely necessary, to-wit: “The thing, the price, and the consent,” , 51 So.
Dugas v. Talley 109 So. 2d 300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Broussard v. Doucet 107 So. 2d 448 La. 1958
However, appellants, particularly Marceaux, , 51 So.
King v. Bickham 105 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
180 , , at page 484, wherein the Supreme Court held: “ * * * , 51 So.
Buras Ice Factory, Inc. v. Department of Highways 103 So. 2d 74 La. 1958
See Revised Civil Code Articles 2254, 2264, 2266; , 51 So.
Wells v. Joseph 101 So. 2d 667 La. 1958
Wood v. Powell 96 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
It was upon the provisions of this Article 2266 , 51 So.
Hodgeson v. McDaniel 96 So. 2d 481 La. 1957
Jackson v. Golson 91 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
Fluker Farms, Inc. v. James 79 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Quatre Parish Co. v. Beauregard Parish School Board 57 So. 2d 197 La. 1952
Meraux v. R. R. Barrow, Inc. 52 So. 2d 863 La. 1951
(2) Is the defendant corporation, the vendee herein, a , 51 So.
Martin v. Fuller 37 So. 2d 851 La. 1948
Thompson v. Thompson 30 So. 2d 321 La. 1947
Dugas v. Powell 21 So. 2d 366 La. 1945
The defendants cite the leading case on the subject, , 51 So.
Neal v. Halliburton 19 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
Civil Code, Article 2266; [ 51 So.
Brown v. Johnson 11 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
[152], 167, ; Waller v. Colvin, 151 La.
Derryberry v. Matterson 192 So. 78 La. 1939
“The recording shall have effect from the time the act is deposited in the proper office, and indorsed by the proper officer.” , 51 So.
Bell v. Canal Bank & Trust Co. 190 So. 359 La. 1939