Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Re Industrial Homestead Ass'n, 198 So. 528.

13 citing documents.

Thibodeaux v. Western World Ins. Co. 391 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Wade v. Joffrion 387 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
It then extensively considered the earlier jurisprudence which had held that if parol evidence as to interests in immovable property is introduced without objection, it may be considered (see most notably (La.App.
Firmin v. Garber 343 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
958 , (1960); and, (La.App.Orl.
Torrey v. Simon-Torrey, Inc. 307 So. 2d 569 La. 1974
Torrey v. Simon-Torrey, Inc. 284 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Corroborative of this point was the statement of the court in the case of , at page 530: "We readily concede that it is well established that parol evidence is inadmissible to vary, contradict, or add to a written contract (Revised Civil Code, art. 2276), and that, though this rule does not, where any ordinary contract is concerned, prevent the introduction of parol testimony to prove a sub
Southern Fleet Leasing Corp. v. Venable 228 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
1st Cir., , and In re Industrial Homestead Ass’n, La.App.Orl., (both, however, overruled in Little v. Haik, 246 La.
Little v. Haik 163 So. 2d 558 La. 1964
and White v. Lockhart (La.App) and cases cited therein.
Little v. Haik 154 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
In Re: Industrial Homestead Association, La.App., (Certiorari Denied); White v. Lockhart, La.App., (Certiorari Denied) and cases cited therein.
White v. Lockhart 129 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Where no objection is made to parol evidence when offered to show title to realty, such objection will be considered as waived and proof will be accepted as sufficient to establish title thereto, in Re Industrial Homestead Association, La.App., -531.
Dane & Northrop v. Rittiner 78 So. 2d 178 La. 1955
388 and In re Industrial Homestead Ass’n, La.App., , are not controlling as they present the reverse of the situation appearing in this case, 1 that is, the defaulting parties in those matters were seeking the enforcement of offers to sell real estate when they, themselves, had failed to comply with the conditions thereof.
Reuther v. Bergeron 59 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
100 ; In Re Industrial Homestead, La.App., ; Tucker v. Rogers, 172 La.
Davidson v. Midstates Oil Corporation 31 So. 2d 7 La. 1947
See also In re Industrial Homestead Ass’n, La.App., .
Treadaway v. Giangrosso 16 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
559 ; In re Industrial *Page 678 Homestead Ass'n, La.App., .