Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 199 So. 175.

23 citing documents.

Phillip Sensat v. Washington Group International, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Sensat v. Washington Group International, Inc. 106 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Wade v. Consolidated Freight 749 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
1st Cir.1983), writs denied
Thompson v. Teledyne Movible Offshore, Inc. 419 So. 2d 822 La. 1982
In 1951, this Court expressly approved earlier jurisprudence in that regard, at 178-79 in its decision, Ohlhausen v. Sternberg, 218 La.
Milligan v. Glenburney Nursing Home 408 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Stapleton v. Travelers Ins. Co. 359 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Forman v. Deaton, Inc. 347 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
He contends that the issues raised here are matters which should be determined on the trial of the case on its merits or pursuant to some other type of pleading, citing McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., supra, La.App., , as authority for that argument.
Turner v. Southern Wheel & Rim Service, Inc. 332 So. 2d 770 La. 1976
United States Leasing Corporation v. Keiler 290 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Welch v. Travelers Insurance Company 225 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
In McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., La.App., , the court stated, "* * * With relation to the applicability of the workmen's compensation law the better rule is that the intention of the parties to the contract should be the determining factor".
Mattel v. Pittman Construction Co. 174 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
690 (La.App.1933); Williams v. Travelers Ins.
Woodham v. Travelers Insurance Company 161 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
690 ; McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., La.App., ; Ohlhausen v. Sternberg Dredging Co., 218 La.
Universal CIT Credit Corporation v. Hulett 151 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., La.App., Orleans, .
Brooks v. Griggs Casing Crews, Inc. 136 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Orleans, 1940, (writs denied).
Loew's, Incorporated v. Don George, Inc. 110 So. 2d 553 La. 1959
When we do this, we are suing in ‘quasi contracts.’ ” In arguing that the damages sustained by it grew out of a contractual relationship — the AntiTrust Act forming a part of the contract— reconvenor cites the cases of McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., La.App., , certiorari denied, and Johnson v. Anderson-Dunham Concrete Co., Inc., 212 La.
Cobb v. International Paper Company 76 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
690 ; McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., La.App., ; Ohlhausen v. Sternberg Dredging Co., 218 La.
Johnson v. El Dorado Creosoting Co. 71 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
Counsel for claimant refer in their brief to McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., La.App., 1940, , and Williams v. Travelers Insurance Company, La.
Ohlhausen v. Sternberg Dredging Co. 50 So. 2d 803 La. 1951
1044 .” McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., La.App., -179 .
Ohlhausen v. Sternberg Dredging Co. 42 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
App., ; Hunt v. Magnolia Petroleum Company, La.
Kansas v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New York 37 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
App., , cited by plaintiff, which was decided by this court, is interesting, as appears from the following language used therein: "We think, however, that, with relation to the applicability of the Workmen's Compensation Law, the better rule is that the intention of the parties to the contract should be the determining
Gardner v. Williams Brothers Corporation 28 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
App., ; Williams v. Travelers Ins.
Williams v. Travelers Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. 19 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
690 , McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., La.App., , and Hunt v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., La.App., .
Hunt v. Magnolia Petroleum Co. 10 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
We have therefore just the converse of the situation which was found under the facts in the case of McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, La.App., , so strongly relied on by the defendant.