DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite W. B. Thompson & Co. v. Gosserand, 55 So. 663.

21 citing documents.

  • Judy Lyons v. Ann Knight La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    652, (1926); W. B. Thompson & So.
  • Lyons v. Knight 65 So. 3d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • Terro v. Chamblee 663 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    Thompson & Co. Gosserand, , 55 So.
  • Weldon v. Republic Bank 414 So. 2d 1361 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
    572 (1909); W. B. Thompson & , 55 So.
  • Union Service & Maintenance Co. v. Powell 393 So. 2d 94 La. 1980
    652 , (1926); W. B. Thompson & , 55 So.
  • Joiner v. Wilson 377 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    W. B. Thompson & , 55 So.
  • Lees v. Smith 363 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    W. B. Thompson & , 55 So.
  • Marionneaux v. King 331 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Our jurisprudence has consistently recognized, with the exception of one case decided at the intermediate appellate level, that a cause of action based on libel and slander for statements made in legal proceedings not yet final, will not be maintained whether it be asserted by reconventional demand, W. B. Thompson & , 55 So.
  • Calvert v. Simon 311 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    572 (1909); W. B. Thompson & , 55 So.
  • Viera v. Kwik Home Services, Inc. 266 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
    478 (1926); W. B. Thompson & , 55 So.
  • Udell, Inc. v. Ascot Oils, Inc. 177 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    572 (1909); W. B. Thompson & , 55 So.
  • Thomas v. Mobley 118 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    W. B. Thompson & , 55 So.
  • Loew's, Incorporated v. Don George, Inc. 110 So. 2d 553 La. 1959
    697 ; Thompson & , 55 So.
  • Cox v. Cashio 96 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Such damages have been held not to be the proper subject of a reconventional demand, either because (such damages essentially being based upon the alleged malicious prosecution of the civil suit) unsuccessful termination cannot of course be proven until after final judgment in the suit, W. B. Thompson & , 55 So.
  • Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. Alwes 21 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
    [4] The trial judge dismissed the reconventional demand of the defendant on *Page 104 , 55 So.
  • Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. Alwes 17 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
    The trial court rendered a judgment on May 19, 1943, dismissing the reconventional demand on the ground that the demand was based on allegations of libel in the pending suit, and for that reason the demand was premature, , 55 So.
  • Waggoner v. Grant Parish Police Jury 4 So. 2d 833 La. 1941
  • Robinson Mercantile Co. v. Freeman 172 So. 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
    697 ; Thompson & , 55 So.
  • Keegan v. Board of Com'rs 98 So. 50 La. 1923
    279 ; Thompson & , 55 South.
  • Shreveport Mill & Elevator Co. v. Stoehr 71 So. 961 La. 1916
    816 , citing Thompson & , - 55 South.
  • Loeb v. Collier 59 So. 816 La. 1912
    Thompson & , 55 South.