Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite First National Bank v. Johnson, 57 So. 930.

14 citing documents.

Surplus Underwriters, Inc. v. Simmons 236 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Forbess v. George Morgan Pontiac Company 135 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Bostwick v. New Hope Baptist Church 111 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
George W. Garig Transfer, Inc. v. Harris 75 So. 2d 28 La. 1954
Florida Molasses Co. v. Berger 55 So. 2d 771 La. 1951
Florida Molasses Co. v. Berger 55 So. 2d 771 La. 1951
Stanley v. Jones 2 So. 2d 45 La. 1941
803 , this Court declared: “A want of citation is cured by the appearance of defendant in the suit for any other purpose than to allege the want of citation.” , 57 So.
Dauterive v. Sternfels 164 So. 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
As to the defendant’s right to urge the second mentioned exception of jurisdiction ratione personae, it is clear that, by first filing his exception of no cause or right of action some two months before, he had waived the right to object to the jurisdiction ratione personae, for as said the Supreme Court of Louisiana, , 57 So.
King v. Illinois Cent. R. Co. 143 So. 95 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1932
In affirming the judgment of the lower court, the Supreme Court said: “It is evident that a defendant cannot logically or consistently deny the ju- *99 srisdiction ratione persona» of a judicial tribunal, and at the same time invoke .its action on the subject-matter of the suit.” , 57 So.
Elliott Electric Co. v. Clark & Melat Drilling Co. 133 So. 530 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Zeller v. Louisiana Cypress Lumber Co. 121 So. 670 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1928
532 ; Bank vs. Johnson, , 57 So.
Vititoe v. Shea 109 So. 785 La. 1926
Martel Syndicate v. Block 98 So. 400 La. 1923
If any other issue be conjointly tendered with such exception, it must necessarily fail.” , 57 South.
Iddle v. Hamler Boiler & Tank Co. 61 So. 532 La. 1913
the jurisdiction be disposed of, was a waiver of the exception to the jurisdiction of the court.” , 57 South.