Hardouin v. Pradillo
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., October 16, 1950 48 So. 2d 105
Hardouin v. Pradillo, 50 So. 2d 834 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Hardouin v. Pradillo 48 So. 2d 105
Opinion text
REGAN, Judge. We granted a rehearing in this matter limited to t!he amount which should be al *835 lowed for replacing certain bronze or copper screens in defendant’s residence situated in William Davis Parkway. In our original decree, 48 So.2d 105 , we permitted the defendant to deduct the sum of $150 for the purpose of replacing the bronze or copper screens with aluminum screens as specified in the building contract. After a careful reconsideration of the matter we are of the opinion that the defendant should be entitled to deduct only the sum of $125 rather than the sum of $150 for this purpose. For the reasons assigned our original opinion and decree is amended by increasing the amount thereof from $355.19 to $380.19, each party to bear his own costs, and, as thus amended, it is reinstated and made the final judgment of this court. Our original decree amended and reinstated.