Hogue v. Sussmane-Stubbs
Also decided on this docket: La., June 1, 2001 793 So. 2d 171
Hogue v. Sussmane-Stubbs, 800 So. 2d 846 (La. 2001).
The holding in the court’s own words
After hearing oral argument and reviewing the record in this case, we conclude that the judgment below does not require the exercise of our supervisory authority.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Hogue v. Sussmane-Stubbs 793 So. 2d 171
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. * Upon application of the Louisiana Patients’ Compensation Fund, we granted certiorari in this case. Hogue v. Sussmane-Stubbs, 01-0899 (La.6/1/01), 793 So.2d 171 . After hearing oral argument and reviewing the record in this case, we conclude that the judgment below does not require the exercise of our supervisory authority. Accordingly, we recall our order of June 1, 2001, as improvidently granted, and deny the application of the Louisiana Patients’ Compensation Fund. Retired Judge Robert L. Lobrano, assigned as Justice Pro Tempore, participating in the de-cisión.