Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State ex rel. L.C.B., 805 So. 2d 159.

14 citing documents.

State of Louisiana in the Interest of G. & B. K.. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
1/15/02), the Supreme Court held that “pursuant to Article 672(A), the Department has the sole authority to determine the specific placements of children committed to its custody.” Further the Court held that the juvenile court has “the ultimate authority over a child’s placement and may approve or reject a case plan s
State In Interest Of G.H. 265 So. 3d 960 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State ex rel. C.N. v. Hawkinberry 953 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
LCB, 2001-2441 (La.1/15/02), .
State, in the Interest of Ra 944 So. 2d 1262 La. 2006
L.C.B., 01-2441, p. 10 (La.1/15/02), , 164-65.
State in the Interest of G.R. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
1/15/02), the supreme court interpreted La.Ch.Code art. 672 stating that “when the court 2 assigns custody of a child adjudicated in need of care to [DSS], the Department has ‘sole authority’ over the placements within its resources of those children.” The court further elab
State ex rel. G.R. 940 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
In State in the Interest of L.C.B., 01-2441, p. 7 (La.1/15/02), , 163, the supreme court interpreted La.Ch.Code art. 672 stating that “when the court | ^assigns custody of a child adjudicated in need of care to [DSS], the Department has ‘sole authority’ over the placements within its resources of those children.” The court further elaborated: Under the statutory scheme in place fo
State Ex Rel. At 936 So. 2d 79 La. 2006
L.C.B., 01-2441 (La.1/15/02), .
State ex rel. A.T. 936 So. 2d 79 La. 2006
L.C.B., 01-2441 (La.1/15/02), .
State ex rel. M.A.A. 897 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
L.C.B., 01-2441, pp. 7-10 (La.1/15/02), -165 ; State ex rel.
State ex rel. D.B. v. M.O. 870 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
State in the Interest of L.C.B., 01-2441 (La.1/15/02), .
State Ex Rel. DB v. MO 870 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State in the Interest of L.C.B., 01-2441 (La.1/15/02), .
State in the Interest of D.B. v. M. and L. O. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
State Ex Rel. JB v. JB, JR. 811 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
In the very recent supreme court pronouncement in State In the Interest of L.C.B., 2001-2441 (La.01/15/02), , the court explained that under the scheme imposed by the various provisions of the children in need of care provisions of the Louisiana Children's Code: [T]he court may review the case plan and either approve the plan or reject it and order the Department to revise the plan accordingly.
State ex rel. J.B. v. J.B. 811 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
In the very recent supreme court pronouncement in State In the Interest of L.C.B., 2001-2441 (La.01/15/02), , the court explained that under the scheme imposed by the various provisions of the children in need of care provisions of the Louisiana Children’s Code: [T]he court may review the case plan and either approve the plan or reject it and order the Department to revise the plan accordingly.