Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ross v. City of New Orleans, 816 So. 2d 857.

14 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana in the Interest of R.R. B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    3 Cir. 2/6/02), writ denied, 02–1041 (La.5/24/02)
  • State ex rel. C.L. 184 So. 3d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/6/02) , , writ denied, 02-1041 (La.5/24/02), .
  • State in the Interest of S. D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State ex rel. S.D. 149 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/6/02) , , writ denied, 02-1041 (La.5/24/02), .
  • State in the Interest of C. C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 2/6/02), -55, writ denied, 02- 1041 (La.5/24/02), stated: When an excessive disposition is complained of in a juvenile proceeding, the record must be reviewed to determine whether the juvenile court imposed the least restrictive disposition consistent with the circumstances of the case, the chi
  • State ex rel. C.C. 124 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 2/6/02), -55 , writ denied, 02-1041 (La.5/24/02), , stated: When an excessive disposition is complained of in a juvenile proceeding, the record must be reviewed to determine whether the juvenile court imposed the least restrictive disposition consistent with the circumstances of the case, the child’s needs, and the best interest of society.
  • State in the Interest of K.E.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    5/24/02), (holding that the failure to timely conduct a disposition hearing is an error patent).
  • State ex rel. K.E.C. 54 So. 3d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 2/6/02) , , writ denied, 02-1041 (La.5/24/02), (holding that the failure to timely conduct a disposition hearing is an error patent).
  • State Ex Rel. Kec 54 So. 3d 735 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    App. 3 Cir. 2/6/02), , writ denied, 02-1041 (La.5/24/02), (holding that the failure to timely conduct a disposition hearing is an error patent).
  • State Ex Rel. Ab 25 So. 3d 1012 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 2/6/02), -55 , writ denied, 02-1041 (La.5/24/02), , stated: When an excessive disposition is complained of in a juvenile proceeding, the record must be reviewed to determine whether the juvenile court imposed the least restrictive disposition consistent with the circumstances of the case, the child's needs, and the best interest of society.
  • State in the Interest of A.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    5/24/02), stated: When an excessive disposition is complained of in a juvenile proceeding, the record must be reviewed to determine whether the juvenile court imposed the least restrictive disposition consistent with the circumstances of the case, the child’s needs, and the best interest of
  • State ex rel. A.B. 25 So. 3d 1012 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 2/6/02), -55 , writ denied, 02-1041 (La.5/24/02), , stated: When an excessive disposition is complained of in a juvenile proceeding, the record must be reviewed to determine whether the juvenile court imposed the least restrictive disposition consistent with the circumstances of the case, the child’s needs, and the best interest of society.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ivory L. Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Erven 830 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    3d Cir.2/6/02), , writ denied, 02-1041 (La.5/24/02), .