DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Francois v. Thibodeaux, 817 So. 2d 1149.

13 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Sidney Myers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
    6/14/02), we held that once a court of appeal declines to exercise its supervisory jurisdiction by denying the writ, the court was without jurisdiction to affirm, reverse or modify the judgment of the trial court.
  • Lucky v. Way 211 So. 3d 392 La. 2016
  • Armstrong Airport Concessions v. K-Squared Restaurant, LLC 178 So. 3d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    (La.6/14/02), ; see also Johnson v. Mike Anderson’s Seafood, Inc., 13-0379, pp. 5-6 (La.App.
  • State v. Ellis 161 So. 3d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    As stated by the Louisiana Supreme Court, in this instance, a court of appeal is “without jurisdiction to affirm, reverse or modify the judgment of the trial court.” Bulot v. Intracoastal Tubular Services, Inc., 2002-1035, p. 1 (La.6/14/02), .
  • Johnson v. Mike Anderson's Seafood, Inc. 144 So. 3d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    The Louisiana Supreme Court addressed this very issue in Bulat v. Intracoastal Tubular Services, Inc., 2002-1035(La.6/14/02), , when it stated: “[H]aving declined to exercise its supervisory jurisdiction by denying the | fiwrit, the court of appeal was without jurisdiction to affirm, reverse or modify the judgment of the trial court.” In a subsequent decision, the Supreme Court reiterated: The court of appeal erred in holding its earlier wri
  • Rain CII Carbon LLC v. ConocoPhillips Co. 105 So. 3d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    In Bulot v. Intracoastal Tubular Services, Inc., 02-1035 (La.6/14/02), , we held that once a court of appeal declines to exercise its supervisory jurisdiction by denying the writ, the court was without jurisdiction to affirm, reverse or modify the judgment of the trial court.
  • Eldred v. Fleming 56 So. 3d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    In Bulot v. Intracoastal Tubular Services, Inc., 02-1035 (La.6/14/02), , the Supreme Court held that once a court of appeal declines to exercise its supervisory jurisdiction by denying the writ, the court was without jurisdiction to affirm, reverse, or modify the judgment of the trial court.
  • Maloney Cinque, LLC v. Pacific Insurance Company, Ltd. 36 So. 3d 236 La. 2010
    See Bulot v. Intracoastal Tubular Services, Inc., 02-1035 (La.6/14/02), .
  • Maloney Cinque, L.L.C. v. Pacific Insurance Co. 36 So. 3d 236 La. 2010
    See Bulot v. Intracoastal Tubular Services, Inc., 02-1035 (La.6/14/02), .
  • Kaem v. Jmc 983 So. 2d 1259 La. 2008
    See Bulot v. Intracoastal Tubular Services, Inc., 02-1035 (La.6/14/02), ; see also Davis v. Jazz Casino Co., 03-0276 (La.6/6/03), .
  • K.A.E.M. v. J.M.C. 983 So. 2d 1259 La. 2008
    See Bulot v. Intracoastal Tubular Services, Inc., 02-1035 (La.6/14/02), ; see also Davis v. Jazz Casino Co., 03-0276 (La.6/6/03), .
  • Davis v. Jazz Casino Co., LLC 849 So. 2d 497 La. 2003
    In Bulot v. Intracoastal Tubular Services, Inc., 02-1035 (La.6/14/02), , we held that once a court of appeal declines to exercise its supervisory jurisdiction by denying the writ, the court was without jurisdiction to affirm, reverse or modify the judgment of the trial court.
  • Richard v. Louisiana Extended Care Centers 835 So. 2d 460 La. 2003
    Extended Care Ctrs., Inc., 02-0978 (La.6/14/02), .