DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Laudumiey, 849 So. 2d 515.

13 citing documents.

  • In Re: William K. Hawkins La. 2022
    6/27/03), (explaining that “the most serious sanction a lawyer may receive under Rule XIX is the sanction of disbarment” and that the amendment providing for permanent disbarment only “relates to the ability of a disbarred attorney to seek readmission”) ; see also In re : Edwards, 04- 0290 (La.
  • In Re: George Allen Roth Walsh La. 2022
    6/27/03), (explaining that “the most serious sanction a lawyer may receive under Rule XIX is the sanction of disbarment” and that the amendment providing for permanent disbarment only “relates to the ability of a disbarred attorney to seek readmission”); see also In re : Edwards, 04-0290 (La.
  • In Re: Michael D. Cox La. 2022
    6/27/03), wherein we held: …Supreme Court Rule XIX does not delegate our original jurisdiction over disciplinary proceedings to the hearing committees and the disciplinary board.
  • Trelles v. Continental Casualty Co. 211 So. 3d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Explained In re Salat 131 So. 3d 841 La. 2014
    Rather, in In re: Laudumiey & Mann, 03-0234 (La.6/27/03), , cert.
  • In RE McCLANAHAN 26 So. 3d 756 La. 2010
    See In re: Laudumiey & Mann, 03-0234 (La.6/27/03), .
  • In re Thomas 973 So. 2d 686 La. 2008
    In re: Laudumiey and Mann, 03-0234 (La.6/27/03), , cert.
  • In Re Shortess 950 So. 2d 570 La. 2007
    In re: Laudumiey & Mann, 03-0234 (La.6/27/03), , cert.
  • In re Norris 939 So. 2d 1221 La. 2006
    See, e.g., In re: Laudumiey & Mann, 03-0234 (La.6/27/03), (conviction of obstruction of justice in connection with the lawyers’ knowing and intentional attempts to influence the testimony of two grand jury witnesses); In re: Pinkston, 02-3251, 02-3252 (La.5/20/03), (lawyer deliberately misrepresented facts to the court in an ^effort to obtain a more lenient sen
  • In re Coney 891 So. 2d 658 La. 2005
    See, e.g., In re: Laudumiey & Mann, 03-0234 (La.6/27/03), , cert.
  • In re Edwards 879 So. 2d 718 La. 2004
    In re: Laudumiey & Mann, 03-0234 (La.6/27/03), , cert.
  • In re O'Keefe 877 So. 2d 79 La. 2004
    See In re: Kirchberg, 03-0957 (La.9/26/03), ; In re: Laudumiey & Mann, 03-0234 (La.6/27/03), , cert.
  • In re Carr 874 So. 2d 823 La. 2004
    1413 , 158 L.Ed.2d 81 ; In re: Laudumiey, 03-0234 (La.6/27/03), , cert.