Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Turner, 843 So. 2d 394.

17 citing documents.

In Re: Eleanor Pierce (Marshall) Stevens Living Trust and Eleanor Pierce Stevens Revocable Gift Trust La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
In re Eleanor Pierce (Marshall) Stevens Living Trust 159 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 10/2/02), , writ denied, 02-3099 (La.5/9/03), ( (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 11/13/02), writ denied 02-3079 (La.5/9/03), (citing Roska v. Peterson, 304 F.3d 982 (10th Cir.2002), abrogated in part on other grounds, 328 F.3d 1230 (10th Cir.2003)).
State v. Lee 124 So. 3d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 11/13/02) , , writ denied 02-3079 (La.5/9/03), , (citing Roska v. Peterson, 304 F.3d 982 (10th Cir.2002), abrogated in part on other grounds, 328 F.3d 1230 (10th Cir.2003)).
Gloria Clay v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Clay v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc. 38 So. 3d 1196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 10/2/02) , , writ denied, 02-3099 (La.5/9/03), .
Judy Davis v. State, Thru Dotd, Office of Risk Management La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
5/9/03), (whether the employer provided the claimant fringe benefits is relevant to the issue of the proper calculation of his wage rate).
Judy Davis v. Louisiana Dept. of Transportation & Development La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
5/9/03), (whether the employer provided the claimant fringe benefits is relevant to the issue of the proper calculation of his wage rate).
State of Louisiana v. Shane Everet Evans La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 11/13/02), writ denied, 02-3079 (La.5/9/03), (citing Roska v. Peterson, 304 F.3d 982 (10th Cir.2002), abrogated in part on other grounds, 328 F.3d 1230 (10th Cir.2003)).
State v. Evans 908 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 11/13/02) , , writ denied, 02-3079 (La.5/9/03), , (citing Roska v. Peterson, 304 F.3d 982 (10th Cir.2002), abrogated in part on other grounds, 328 F.3d 1230 (10th Cir.2003)).
Samuel A. Daenen v. the Cajun Landing Restaurant La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Daenen v. Cajun Landing Restaurant 899 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 10/2/02) , , writ denied, 02-3099 (La.5/9/03), .
Pamela Metoyer v. Roy O. Martin, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
5/9/03), the employer asserted that the employees’ benefit calculation dispute should be limited to the period given in answer to interrogatories.
Metoyer v. Roy O. Martin, Inc. 895 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3 Cir. 10/2/02) , , writ denied, 02-3099 (La.5/9/03), , the employer asserted that the employees' benefit calculation dispute should be limited to the period given in answer to interrogatories.
State v. Lewis 878 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
4 Cir. 11/13/02) , , writ denied 02-3079 (La.5/9/03), , (citing Roska v. Peterson, 304 F.3d 982 (10th Cir.2002), abrogated in part on other grounds, 328 F.3d 1230 (10th Cir.2003)).
Bruce A. Baker v. Mazda Motor of America La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
5/9/03), we quoted our decision in Sinegal v. Able Glass Co., Inc., 95-10, p. 5 (La.App.
Baker v. Mazda Motor of America 856 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
3 Cir. 10/2/02) , , writ denied, 02-3099 (La.5/9/03), we quoted our decision in Sinegal v. Able Glass Co., Inc., 95-10, p. 5 (La.App.