Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Berniard v. Berniard, 877 So. 2d 147.

14 citing documents.

Andermann v. Rouillier 271 So. 3d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Crooks v. Department Of Natural Resources 263 So. 3d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
7/2/04), ; and King's Farm, Inc. v. Concordia Parish Police Jury , 97-1056 (La.App.
Steve Crooks and Era Lea Crooks v. State of La., Department of Natural Resources La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
7/2/04), (holding that neither a sheriff nor his predecessor in title, the police jury, can acquire property by acquisitive prescription); and King’s Farm, Inc. v. Concordia Parish Police Jury, 97-1056 (La.App.
Lillian E. Landaiche Roy v. Sheriff Bill Belt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
7/2/04), (Belt I), a panel of this court reversed, finding in favor of the Roys.
Roy v. Belt 149 So. 3d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 2/18/04) , , writ denied, 04-1149 (La.7/2/04), {Belt I), a panel of this court reversed, finding in favor of the Roys.
Juanita Quinn v. Vidalia Apparel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Quinn v. Vidalia Apparel 54 So. 3d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 4/7/04) , , writ denied, 04-1150 (La.7/2/04), .
Barbara Carradine v. Regis Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Carradine v. Regis Corp. 52 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 4/7/04) , , writ denied, 04-1150 (La.7/2/04), .
Adams v. Parish 978 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
3rd Cir.2/18/04), , writ denied, 04-1149 (La.7/2/04), .
Mailhes v. District Attorney 967 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 4/7/04), , *603 writ denied, 04-1150 (La.7/2/04), , quoting Sevin v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc., 94-1859, p. 5 (La.4/10/95), .
Gernine Mailhes v. District Attorney, Parish of Calcasieu La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
7/2/04), quoting Sevin v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc., 94-1859, p. 5 (La.
Shane Richard v. Machine Specialty & Mfg. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
7/2/04), in which the plaintiff-cashier returned to work at her previous salary, even though her employer made several accommodations, including allowing her to use a stool, to take time off for physical therapy, and to refrain from heavy lifting.
Richard v. Machine Specialty & Mfg., Inc. 921 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 4/7/04) , , writ denied, 04-1150 (La.7/2/04), , in which the plaintiff-cashier returned to work at her previous salary, even though her employer made several accommodations, including allowing her to use a stool, to take time off for physical therapy, and to refrain from heavy lifting.